Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Been to a Nursing Home Lately?

(Photo: Ulrich Joho / Flickr)

With Republicans in the Senate and Congress almost unanimous about wanting to terminate Medicare and Medicaid, I think it’s time we all pay a visit to a nursing home and see the greedy senior citizens whose stubborn longevity threatens the very idea of a luxury tax break on yachts and second homes.

I’m serious. This is what it’s come down to. During my lifetime, the richest five percent of the American population saw their tax rates drop by almost two thirds while their income outpaced the rest of the nation by similar numbers. Despite the revenue shortfalls caused by these cuts, the Republican Bush administration started two wars, one of which is now the longest war in US history, saddling us with what is ballooning into a multi-trillion dollar war debt. But unlike their predecessors, they never instituted a war tax to cover these costs. The result was predictable to anyone who ever balanced a checkbook. The math is simple. Wild military spending coupled with irresponsible tax giveaways to the rich equals structural deficits as sure as the sun will rise.

Add to this the mayhem that resulted from the deregulation of the financial industry, where banks were allowed to make insanely bad loans, then bundle them together, wrap them in shiny cellophane, and dump them on an unsuspecting global securities market, and you have the financial collapse of 2008. Not allowing a good crisis to go to waste, the same politicians whose policies created this perfect storm of a fiscal collapse and a bankrupt government have used it to push “austerity,” not in the way of a responsible tax plan or the curtailment of military spending and corporate welfare but in the form of pushing the agenda they’ve been pushing for more than four decades—the wholesale looting of our national wealth through the annihilation of the public sector.

The logic, sold to us daily by the most sophisticated propaganda system the world has ever known, goes like this: Don’t blame the greedy rich, who psychotically want to reap unimaginable benefits from society while essentially putting nothing back into the pot. And don’t blame the hawks in government or the war profiteers who swell their campaign coffers and fund their propaganda with our tax dollars. And certainly don’t blame the multinational companies that often own both our energy and defense sectors, and our media. No. They have nothing to do with our current fiscal problems. Instead blame old people, greedily clinging to life, taking the Jell-O right out of our mouths.

In-depth reporting and analysis is becoming harder and harder to find. Click here to help support this work.

The deal we all signed onto went like this: We pay Social Security and Medicaid taxes all of our productive lives. In exchange, we gain the peace of mind that when we eventually grow old and fall ill, we will have some baseline of medical support. We pay when we’re strong and we collect when we’re weak. In the interim, the knowledge that we can grow old with some modicum of dignity and a decent chance of survival cuts down on our stress for the five decades or so between youth and old age. It’s not a bad deal, which is why the American people overwhelmingly support these programs.

The new math, arriving in the form of what’s become known as the Ryan Budget, or the Republican Kill Medicare Budget, breaks this promise of security to the American people. Put simply, under the GOP plan, we work for decades paying into a system that is supposed to give us some sense of social security, hence the name, only to be told, perhaps in 2012, that we’re fucked. Those years or decades of payments are being looted to underwrite the continuation of wars and tax cuts for the rich. What we get instead is a coupon which we can use toward the cost of a private insurance policy, if we can somehow afford one, and if one is miraculously available. Picture this conversation: “My mother (or uncle, or brother, or fill-in-the-blank) has Alzheimer’s (or MS, or ALS, or terminal cancer, or had a stroke, or an aneurism, or fill-in-the-blank) and needs 24-hour medical care. How much will it cost to insure them? We have a $1,500-per-month government coupon. Hello, are you still there?”

I’ve recently been to a nursing home, visiting a relative. Almost all the patients there have the bulk of their bills paid by a combination of Medicaid and Medicare, though it’s safe to say that a good number of them have no idea who pays their bills, or where exactly they are, for that matter. The common route into a decent nursing home involves the patient showing evidence of some sizable life savings that is still intact and hasn’t been lost in any medical bankruptcy or junk bond investment scheme. As a price of admittance, this sum would be doled out to the nursing home until it runs out, which is usually within a year, at which time the formerly middle-class senior, now pauperized, has Medicaid take over the bulk of their nursing home bills. This is the real “death tax,” a 100 percent inheritance tax on the middle class, brought on by a mean, stingy, and terribly inadequate social safety net.

If you’re poor, however, it gets worse. Your choice of nursing homes is limited to those that will accept your loved one without the prerequisite dowry. This can mean moving them into a renovated junior high school staffed by exploited, exhausted and terribly underpaid and inevitably impatient and miserable workers. Still, this Medicaid sponsored purgatory beats what the Republicans are now proposing—which is to take even this away from infirm seniors.

I can hear the responses to this column already. “No, we don’t want to kill Medicare, we want to reform Medicare, we want to save Medicare, we want the magic of the market, the gods of free enterprise and the goodness of greed to…”

And so “war is peace.” None of this nonsense, no matter how many times Fox and Rush Limbaugh repeat it, holds water if you actually read the Medicare-terminating budget that every Republican in the House of Representatives voted for. Don’t believe me. Read it.

In the crazy zone, no Medicaid means no more Jell-O for those freeloading seniors. Once we show them the door, no doubt they’ll forget all about those lazy years spent as wards of the state and get out there and get jobs, start businesses, and get the economy moving again. On the ground here on earth, however, the result of this sadism are unthinkable. Seniors overwhelmed by declining health issues, no matter how much they may have saved, can never hope to pay the medical bills a free market will throw at them.

I have no doubt that many middle-aged children of declining seniors will bankrupt themselves throwing their meager life savings at their parents health bills, only to buy a few more months of health care. Without money for long-term nursing home care, at best, they’ll see their parents die before their eyes holed up in their basements and living rooms. And no, this is not an exaggeration. Think about it. Think about the role Medicare and Medicaid play in our society. Then think about what America would be without this minimal social safety net—no matter what type of coupon the crooks in Washington give you. Go to a nursing home and imagine what a life under a Republican government would look like.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.