British Columbia’s Environment Minister Mary Polak tweeted about meeting with Chevron’s Climate Change ambassador at COP20 – a meeting followed by a side event where she touted liquefied natural gas as a method to “displace” Chinese coal emissions. (Photo: Province of British Columbia)The Canadian government has established itself as a country representing fossil fuels at the United Nations climate talks that happened last week in Lima, Peru. The government must do more to represent its true citizens.
At the COP20 United Nations climate change negotiations in Lima, Peru this week, it’s clear that the Canadian government is representing Canadians when making decisions – if by Canadians, one means fossil fuel companies, that is.
Anyone who’s never visited the country might assume that Canada is only comprised of Shell, Chevron, TransCanada and their siblings, since the Canadian government seems to be paying attention to no one else here in Lima. It seems there is no room for concerned or affected citizens in Canadian negotiators’ packed agendas – although fossil fuel representatives’ requests are seemingly always accommodated. It goes without saying that this industry wields significant power to interfere with the UN process.
Examples of this disproportionate influence are crystal clear to young Canadians at this conference. Canada has been getting cozy with Chevron and TransCanada at stakeholder briefing sessions that are designed to inform Non-Governmental Organizations including youth, women and indigenous groups of any progress during the talks. Instead of being included in the conversation, frontline communities are once again pushed to the sidelines.
It doesn’t get any better on the provincial front. Canadian environment ministers such as British Columbia’s Mary Polak have been bragging about their scheduled meetings with Chevron’s Climate Change ambassador. Has Minister Polak met with any frontline communities yet in her time in Lima? If she has, she certainly hasn’t tweeted about it with such enthusiasm. In fact, Minister Polak followed her Chevron meeting with a side event at the negotiations, at which she touted the advantages of liquefied natural gas as a method to “displace” Chinese coal emissions. It is clear that, to the dismay of Canadians and the values they stand for, the Canadian government is allowing fossil fuel companies to usurp the UN process.
Seeing such a heavy influence of fossil fuel companies at these negotiations is disconcerting. Canadians pride themselves on their country being progressive, just and kind, but the current actions of the Canadian government are anything but. Canadians have the right to demand better representation at these negotiations, and deserve to have people representing them who aren’t consistently being called out as bullies.
Canadians also deserve to know more about what is going on within these halls. The official statements on the part of Canada have been mum, and for good reason: Canada has nothing to say that would make citizens back home proud. That, however, certainly does not mean that they should not solicit input from stakeholders.
The influence of fossil fuels transcends this conference. In fact, just last Tuesday, when Prime Minister Stephen Harper was asked about the possibility of regulations for fossil fuel companies in Canada, he dismissed the suggestion as “crazy, crazy.” While tar sands are expected to account for a 38 percent increase in Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, it seems as though the Prime Minister isn’t too concerned about the oil and gas industry. Why is this, when Canadian negotiators in Lima keep repeating that Canada will do everything in its power to meet its emissions goals, which are impossible to attain if business continues as usual?
Canadians from all walks of life – from indigenous elders, to young generations, to women, to Albertans, to Quebecers – should be included in more accessible, productive conversations with the Canadian government. While one may argue that fossil fuel companies are shareholders in their own right, it is widely understood that their presence will undermine this process completely. If tobacco companies are no longer allowed at World Health Organization meetings, why are fossil fuels allowed into a conference about climate change action?
Canadians should not stand for the carte blanche granted to these companies. Canadians must contact their elected representatives – at all levels of government – to let them know that climate change action is deeply rooted in Canadian values. If Canadians don’t stand for equality, transparency and fairness when it comes to climate change, than for what will we stand?
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.