Part of the Series
Despair and Disparity: The Uneven Burdens of COVID-19
Donald Trump had quite a day for himself on Tuesday. During a Rose Garden event intended to promote protections for senior citizens with diabetes, the man who recently pondered the possibility of injecting COVID-19 patients with disinfectant mused audibly on the potential virtues of insulin… for himself.
“I don’t use insulin,” he said. “Should I be? Huh? I never thought about it. But I know a lot of people are very badly affected, right? Unbelievable.”
As the event blundered on, diabetic seniors took a back seat to Trump’s ceaseless cascade of petty grudges and serial lies. He blamed Joe Biden for the pandemic, pledged to protect Social Security and Medicare after threatening to link cuts to those programs to COVID relief payments, garblewarbled his way through comments on “price transparency” in the face of skyrocketing insulin costs, called for a murder investigation into MSNBC host Joe Scarborough, insisted he has the authority to overrule state governors on reopening houses of worship (he does not), referred to voting as an “honor” and not a right, and dismissed wearing a mask to thwart the virus as being “politically correct.”
This was just one small slice of Trump’s day. “For all of the political hacks out there,” he ranted on Twitter before lunch, “if I hadn’t done my job well, & early, we would have lost 1 1/2 to 2 Million People, as opposed to the 100,000 plus that looks like will be the number.” This, from the man who spent the early portion of the pandemic pretending the whole thing was “going to go away” and was “very well under control.”
I’m so old, I remember when Republicans went out of their way to grovel at the feet of all things military. Not so much anymore in Trump’s GOP, it seems, given that the commander-in-chief of all U.S. forces attacked Marine Corps veteran Rep. Conor Lamb of Pennsylvania as an “American fraud.” Not to be outdone even by himself, Trump vividly misrepresented Lamb’s voting record, but that was before misspelling his name as “Connor Lamm” in a since-deleted tweet.
“There is NO WAY (ZERO!) that Mail-In Ballots will be anything less than substantially fraudulent,” Trump bleated for breakfast. “Mail boxes will be robbed, ballots will be forged & even illegally printed out & fraudulently signed.” Trump is eyeing the 2020 election the way recalcitrant children stare dolefully at the broccoli on their dinner plates, and for good reason: His re-election numbers are slipping. He is in favor of anything that will make casting a ballot in November a more challenging, if not lethal affair, despite the fact that mail-in voting would be a boon to his loyal rural supporters.
This tsunami of presidential bilge did manage to summon a bit of tepid pushback from some uncommon corners. The eternally conservative editorial page of The Wall Street Journal rose in post-horse-barn-door dudgeon to denounce Trump’s attacks on MSNBC’s Scarborough as behavior that is “debasing his office.” Trump had been debasing his office every day for the last 1,222 days when the Journal finally perked up, and they picked this media-centric mini-scandal to get righteous about. Color me unimpressed.
Trump has used Twitter as the main vector for the poison he vomits into the body politic, and yesterday, the social media giant finally did a very small thing to address this: It slapped a “fact check” label on Trump’s tweet about mail-in voter fraud. The brass at Twitter probably believe this is some kind of thunderclap move, the internet equivalent of hanging a scarlet letter around Trump’s neck. “For its 14-year existence, Twitter has allowed misinformation by world leaders and everyday citizens to spread virtually unchecked,” reports The Washington Post. But yeah, totally, that “fact check” label will straighten everything out.
The ragged, haggard, desolate, bleak, wrenching, altogether horrifying truth of the matter is that I could have written an article almost exactly like this each and every one of those 1,222 days, and almost certainly could do so tomorrow and the day after, ad infinitum.
Why is today different? Because either by the end of this day, or by tomorrow, the United States will pass the brutal threshold of 100,000 COVID-19 deaths. According to Johns Hopkins, the count stood at 98,933 souls as of 9:45 am this morning. It did not have to be this way, and in the face of such a towering failure, Donald Trump has chosen once again to take Steve Bannon’s advice and “flood the zone with shit.”
“We pass 15,000,000 Tests Today, by far the most in the World,” Trump crowed on Twitter this morning.
Meanwhile, executive director of the Association of Public Health Laboratories Scott Becker referred to Trump’s gossamer national testing strategy as being equivalent to The Hunger Games.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.