Skip to content Skip to footer

As Speaker Deal Is Considered, Matt Gaetz Indicates He May Never Back McCarthy

GOP House leader Kevin McCarthy has been unable to secure the speakership in 11 votes so far.

Rep.-elect Matt Gaetz speaks to reporters following a meeting with House Republicans at the U.S. Capitol Building on January 3, 2023, in Washington, D.C.

As Republicans negotiate a potential deal to defeat the week-long impasse in selecting a speaker of the House of Representatives, one of the GOP holdouts, Rep. Matt Gaetz (Florida), has indicated that support from him and his allies won’t come easy.

GOP House leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (California) has made 11 unsuccessful attempts so far to win a majority of votes in the race for the speakership. Because the Republican Party has 222 members in the House, McCarthy can only afford to lose four GOP votes to attain the 218-vote majority needed. However, around 20 Republicans have opposed him each time, and he has barely made it over 200 votes in any of the votes held so far.

News of a potential deal to defeat the impasse spread on Thursday evening, as negotiations between McCarthy and the GOP holdouts began to make headway. Though the framework of the deal has not been finalized, it appears that it could redirect some of the anti-McCarthy votes but not all of them.

Those backing McCarthy believe that getting even a few of the holdouts to vote for him will create momentum for the House GOP leader. But McCarthy needs to get all but four holdouts to agree to his terms in order to win the speakership, which will be challenging given that some of his opponents are asking for more than he wants to give.

Gaetz is perhaps the most steadfast holdout among the Republicans opposed to McCarthy so far, making it clear to reporters on Thursday afternoon that he would only support McCarthy if he agreed to have a weak and constrained speakership.

“This ends one of two ways,” Gaetz said. “Either Kevin McCarthy withdraws from the race or we construct a straight jacket that he is unable to evade.”

Gaetz, who voted three times on Thursday for former President Donald Trump to be speaker, indicated that he and many of the 20 Republicans opposed to McCarthy are willing to hold out as long as it takes —“as far as the cherry blossoms fall,” he said, referring to a phenomenon in Washington, D.C. that usually occurs in April.

Meanwhile, the patience of Republicans who have been supporting McCarthy is beginning to wear thin. Rep. Ken Buck (Colorado), for example, indicated prior to the ballots held on Thursday that if McCarthy couldn’t win the speakership that day, he would consider nominating someone else who could.

McCarthy faces another issue in regard to negotiating a deal: If he grants too many concessions to the holdouts, some of the most extremist members of the GOP, he risks alienating moderates within the party.

“GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy seems willing to give away just about anything to become House speaker. But at a certain point, concessions to far-right members could start to bleed support from his existing allies,” said a report from the conservative publication The Dispatch.

If the impasse continues for several more days, there is a slim but real possibility that a “coalition” candidate — a person that a significant number of Republicans and Democrats could agree on — will be nominated and secure the 218 votes needed to become speaker. Such an agreement between the two parties’ moderates would require concessions from Republicans — potentially including a power-sharing agreement in the next session of the House — in order to be successful.

If the deal between McCarthy and the far right holdouts falls apart, or if it’s only able to sway a few of the anti-McCarthy Republicans, the likelihood of a bipartisan, coalition candidate will increase tremendously, especially if a speaker cannot be chosen by next week.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy