Researchers have long assumed that when animals are left without large areas of intact habitat, they are at greater risk of extinction: fragmentation leaves animals confined to ever-smaller areas, restricting movement and gene flow and leaving species vulnerable to threats ranging from poachers to climate change.
A study published July 3 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) set out to quantify this risk for more than 4,000 land-dwelling mammal species across the globe — and found that species with more fragmented habitats were at greater risk of extinction.
This link persisted even when researchers accounted for other factors including species’ body size and overall range size.
“We used statistical models that evaluated the relative contribution of fragmentation and geographic range size, as well as body size, on extinction risk,” lead author Kevin Crooks, a professor in Colorado State University’s Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, told Mongabay by email. “The statistical models indicate that fragmentation is still an important predictor of extinction risk after statistically accounting for the effects of range size and body size. Statistical models that included fragmentation had the greatest weight of evidence from the data.”
Aerial view of forest fragments in Costa Rica. (Photo: Rhett A. Butler for Mongabay)
The research team — which arose from a long-term collaboration between Colorado State University and Sapienza University in Rome, Italy — used high-resolution habitat-suitability models to measure the degree of fragmentation facing 4,018 species from 26 mammalian orders. The scientists then analyzed the relationship between habitat fragmentation and extinction risk, as assessed by the IUCN Red List.
This, the researchers note, was the first time this link had been quantified for a major group of animals on a global scale.
“Perhaps the most surprising finding was that mammals not currently listed as threatened by the IUCN (including Near Threatened and Data Deficient species) have higher levels of fragmentation within their known ranges,” Crooks said. “This suggests that the threat of fragmentation exists at the earliest and least understood stages of endangerment.”
The team also created global maps identifying both key areas of intact habitats and “fragmentation hotspots” for mammals. Among key areas of concern are South America outside of the Amazon Basin, and parts of south-central Asia, eastern North America and Europe. Human activity such as urban development and deforestation are major drivers of fragmentation in these areas.
Significantly, the researchers found that very little key mammalian habitat has been set aside for conservation. Only 3.6 percent of the average species’ range was found to consist of “high-suitability habitat” (defined as preferred habitat where a particular species can persist) located within known protected areas. With 15 percent of global land area currently set aside for conservation, these findings highlight “the inadequacy of the global network of protected areas,” the study concludes.
“[H]abitat fragmentation is a primary threat to biological diversity worldwide,” Crooks said. “For the first time in Earth’s history, one species — Homo sapiens (or humans) — dominates the globe. In contrast to prior eras, we travel and communicate across the entire planet. Unfortunately, the more ‘connected’ we become, non-human life with which we share this planet becomes increasingly disconnected, at their peril.
“Although habitat fragmentation needs to be addressed urgently, we also emphasize that it is a manageable global conservation challenge. The findings of the study warrant intensified efforts to protect remnant habitat patches, as well as to restore connectivity to fragmented landscapes through conservation tools such as wildlife corridors and habitat linkages.”
In the future, Crooks said, he hopes such quantitative measures of fragmentation can be incorporated into extinction risk assessments, such as those carried out by the IUCN, in order to help identify strategic conservation priorities.
An important next step, Crooks added, is to apply the team’s model on the local scale, and validate their findings with field data on mammal distribution and habitat use. “This will help to more thoroughly assess their utility for real-world conservation application,” Crooks said.
Forest fragmentation due to oil palm plantations in Indonesia. (Photo: Rhett A. Butler for Mongabay)
Footnotes:
Kevin R. Crooks el al., “Quantification of habitat fragmentation reveals extinction risk in terrestrial mammals,” PNAS (2017). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1705769114
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.