Skip to content Skip to footer

As Election Day Nears, Harms of Austerity at USPS Are Clearer Than Ever

Officials are sounding the alarm about mail-in voting again, signaling the need for investment in the postal service.

Mail-in ballots sit in containers from the U.S. Postal Service waiting to be processed by election workers at the Salt Lake County election office in Salt Lake City, Utah, on October 29, 2020.

Oh poor, embattled Postal Service — your plight embodies the platitude, “We hurt the ones we love the most.”

Year after year, you’re trotted out as the country’s favorite federal agency. More than 70 percent of people sing your praises. Your fan club is so big, you even have your own merch collabs; your insignia has adorned hats and hoodies, from Forever 21 to Vans.

But love doesn’t keep the lights on. And, unfortunately, you’re still broke.

Last fiscal year, the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) recorded $6.5 billion in losses — as in $6.5 billion more in losses than it had projected. As in the agency was planning on breaking even. Oops.

The blow was particularly crushing, because once upon a time, not that long ago, Democrats rallied around the cause of saving the USPS. A truly bipartisan bill took shape. “The Postal Service is fundamental to our economy, to our democracy, to our health and the very sense of who we are as a nation,” President Joe Biden said as he signed the Postal Service Reform Act into law on April 6, 2022.

Thanks to federal action, the USPS actually had a net income of $56 billion in fiscal year 2022. That’s because the law reversed a 2006 mandate that the USPS prefund its retiree health care benefits 75 years in advance — a requirement no other federal agency entity faces — and so the USPS was forgiven of more than $59 billion in defaulted payments. (Student loan forgiveness next, please?) After years of scraping by, light was finally on the horizon.

Of course, Congress didn’t step in until things began to look particularly dire. The USPS faced a high-profile crisis during the 2020 election cycle, after Postmaster General Louis DeJoy took office in May and quickly implemented a string of unpopular operational changes. In a matter of months, DeJoy eliminated overtime pay, reduced post office operating hours nationwide, removed hundreds of mail-sorting machines and public collection boxes, and banned postal workers from making extra trips to ensure on-time mail delivery. A Republican megadonor appointed by President Donald Trump, DeJoy was the first postmaster in 20 years without prior USPS experience. It’s perhaps unsurprising, then, that these cost-cutting attempts were ill-fated.

Mail began piling up, as post offices across the country grappled with weeklong backlogs. Prescription medication, Social Security checks, bills, and other important mail items were delayed in transit. As the election loomed, DeJoy told officials that state deadlines for casting mail-in ballots were “incongruous with the Postal Service’s delivery standards.” This was, of course, the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, before vaccinations were widely available, and so a record number of voters were expected to cast their votes safely via mailbox, instead of trekking in person to the ballot box.

However, facing heavy criticism, lawsuits and an emergency congressional hearing, DeJoy paused his rollout of the reforms until after the election. Four years later, DeJoy once again is suspending cost-cutting efforts in the weeks leading up to the November election, telling reporters the USPS is implementing “extraordinary measures” to ensure all ballots are delivered on time.

In July, the USPS Office of Inspector General released its audit of the agency’s election mail readiness. The verdict: eh, not too bad, but should definitely be better.

I was heartened to read that political and election mail were processed on time about 97 to 98 percent of the time. But the report also noted that, at nearly half of the mail processing facilities evaluated, postal workers didn’t know election mail had to be postmarked — which some states require for a mail-in ballot to be counted. Additionally, 80 percent of mail processing facilities didn’t follow guidelines that require facilities to certify that all of their political and election mail has been sent out each day.

In September, the National Association of Secretaries of State and the National Association of State Election Directors — each representing all 50 states — as well as the presidents of 29 local election official associations, sent a letter to DeJoy expressing their concerns about election mail service. The letter cited instances of election mail being marked as undeliverable at higher rates than usual, and officials demanded that DeJoy “take immediate and tangible corrective action to address the ongoing performance issues with USPS election mail service.”

But DeJoy, for his part, insists that everything is hunky dory. From the other side of the aisle, American Postal Workers Union (APWU) President Mark Dimondstein has also tried to allay voters’ concerns about post office performance, arguing that Trump has been sowing doubt about the USPS’s ability to deliver election mail in order to dissuade people from voting. Still, Dimondstein and the APWU have repeatedly raised concerns that the Postal Service is short-staffed. They’re doing their best, but they need more support.

In other words, the Postal Service is still in need of an overhaul. Even though the USPS is largely viewed as a public service, it’s expected to fund itself without public money — thanks in part to legislation enacted by none other than President Ronald Reagan, that vanguard of privatization. Since that revenue model hasn’t really worked, Congress has had to appropriate funds to help the USPS stay afloat in recent years — and now, as a result, simply sending and receiving mail is a divisive politicized issue.

Postal workers and advocates for USPS reform say that the 2022 law is a good start, but there are more measures that should be taken to safeguard the Postal Service’s financial future. One of these proposals is postal banking, or offering a public banking option at USPS locations. Nearly 10 million adults don’t have a bank account, which means they spend up to $2,400 on fees each year just to access their money. Postal banking would expand families’ access to an affordable banking option while generating revenue for the USPS.

The proposal is an obvious win-win — so, of course, it’s languishing. The Postal Service Reform Act rightly expanded the USPS’s ability to perform nonpostal services, and the USPS began rolling out a check-cashing pilot program. But a 2023 report from the Save the Post Office coalition raises red flags: The test run is only active in four locations, generally not in underserved communities that would benefit most from postal banking, and it limits cashable checks to a $500 max. “This pilot runs the risk of making the same mistakes as the existing financial services offered in post offices, which have failed to keep up with technological advances and have become inaccessible and more expensive due to Postmaster General Louis DeJoy’s extreme price hikes,” the report’s authors wrote.

Unfortunately, we’ll only know whether election mail is successfully delivered once Election Day is all said and done. But there’s at least one thing we know for certain: Regardless of whatever happens when all of the mail-in ballots are finally tallied, if the tallies don’t fall in his favor, Donald Trump is going to make a big stink.

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We’re presently working to find 1500 new monthly donors to Truthout before the end of the year.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy