An Arkansas county librarian who was fired last month over her refusal to enforce a book ban is saying that those who targeted her were motivated by bigoted and fascistic viewpoints.
Patricia Hector, who had served as director of Saline County Library in Saline County, Arkansas, since 2016, was fired in early October after the Saline County Quorum Court passed a resolution to remove books deemed inappropriate from the children’s section. Hector refused to remove the books, noting that doing so would effectively “erase people of color and marginalize LGBTQ people.” In response to her stance, she was terminated.
“It’s a perverse world when we’re talking about trying to criminalize librarians,” Nate Coulter, executive director of the Central Arkansas Library System in Little Rock, said in response to Hector’s firing.
Hector described her termination as unjust, but also as a relief, since her ouster seemed all but certain for several weeks up to that point. The campaign to remove her library’s books included a targeted campaign against Hector, going so far as to involve billboard advertising on a local highway.
“It’s been very stressful, it’s been hard to do my job, but the staff we’ve just kept plugging along and I always thought any day now I’ll be fired,” Hector said after her firing.
In an interview that was published in The Arkansas Times last week, Hector elaborated on being removed from the county library.
“I’d rather be fired for upholding the First Amendment instead of sued for violating it,” she explained.
Hector said that those who lodged complaints against her were part of a coordinated effort to target libraries.
“They were not library patrons who happened to find a book they didn’t like. They had lists,” Hector said.
The people who sought to target books in the children’s section of the library were motivated by a desire “to take control and force others to align with their beliefs,” Hector went on, adding that they espoused the ideals of “bigotry” and “fascism” in doing so.
Hector also said that she wouldn’t change anything about the actions that led to her termination. “There’s nothing wrong with the library’s books,” she said, adding that there was “nothing salacious about those books” that received formal complaints.
She noted that the complainers were inconsistent in their logic, seeking to ban books that had LGBTQ or racial themes over supposed sexual content, but refusing to do the same for heterocentric media.
“They [county officials] said it was sex in children’s books, but really it was anything with LGBTQ issues or racism. Heterosexual sex doesn’t make their list,” Hector said.
Hector told The Times that her stand wasn’t just about combating book bans, but also about ensuring that texts remain accessible, saying:
Banning books is illegal according to the First Amendment. Moving books to a place people can’t get to is the same as banning. Moving them to an area that stigmatizes the books based on content also goes against the First Amendment.
Hector plans to sue the county over her termination. But if the Supreme Court eventually sides with book-banners, she indicated that she may take more drastic action.
“When the Supreme Court decides that it’s OK to ban books, then I’ll think about moving to another country,” Hector said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.