Republicans in the Arizona state legislature have crafted new rules to shield themselves from future public records requests — an action that open government advocates say is a direct response to requests over the past few years related to the GOP’s attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
A recent state Supreme Court ruling determined that the judicial branch in Arizona lacks the authority to enforce laws on how Arizonans can request open records from within the legislative branch. In response to that ruling, both houses of the state legislature, which are controlled by Republicans, voted earlier this week to change standards for handling and maintaining communications records among their members and staff.
The new rules exempt legislative lawmakers and their staffers from having to adhere to state public records laws. The rules also authorize the destruction of communications, such as emails and text messages, after 90 days — a timeframe in which many interested parties, including journalists, investigators and residents, may not even know that such records exist.
Some of the rules differ between the two legislative chambers. In the state House, for example, the new rules enable lawmakers to immediately delete all text messages they send or receive, as well as any calendar records and communications on social media. While text messages must be maintained for 90 days in the state Senate, the rule only applies to government devices — lawmakers are allowed to immediately delete communications from their personal devices if they wish to do so.
Following the 2020 presidential election, in which President Joe Biden became the first Democrat to win the state in decades, Arizona lawmakers demanded numerous audits in response to unfounded complaints from far right activists about alleged election fraud. One of these audits was performed by an unqualified organization called Cyber Ninjas; much of the reporting on that audit was obtained through open records requests to the state legislature. Open records requests were also responsible for making public emails in which Ginni Thomas, wife to federal Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, urged Arizona legislators to overturn the election results.
Open government advocates noted that, had the rules that Republicans passed this week been in place prior to the 2020 election, much of that information wouldn’t have been attainable.
“This rule change only benefits lawmakers who want to hide the truth from the people they serve,” Heather Sawyer, executive director at American Oversight, said to NBC News.
The new rules will “further obscure the roles of far-right national groups,” Brendan Fischer, head of the group Documented, said to The Washington Post.
Michael Squires, editor for ProPublica in the southwest region of the U.S., expressed his disgust with Republicans’ action on social media. “The clown car gets tinted windows,” Squires wrote.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 340 new monthly donors in the next 5 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy