An Arizona state judge has rejected challenges from an anti-abortion group to a constitutional initiative seeking to expand abortion rights in the state and set to appear on the November 2024 ballot.
The proposed amendment seeks to establish “a fundamental right to abortion” in Arizona, limiting the state’s “ability to interfere with that right before fetal viability” — typically understood to be 22-25 weeks of pregnancy, and a standard that existed for nearly 50 years under Roe v. Wade before the federal Supreme Court dismantled that precedent. Regulations on abortion can occur after that time period, but they cannot restrict the right to obtain the procedure if it’s sought “to protect the life or health of the pregnant individual.”
Arizona Right to Life, a far right anti-abortion group, challenged the proposal on several fronts. Initially, the organization had argued that signatures were collected in an improper way, stating without evidence that some signatures were faked, for example. However, the group dropped that challenge and instead focused on other dubious claims, including allegations that the wording of the amendment and an accompanying explanation of it was too confusing for voters.
“The Amendment purports to allow regulation of late-term abortions but then guts that proffer with a huge loophole for ‘good faith’ abortionist judgements about the malleable scope of ‘health,'” Arizona Right to Life said in its brief.
On Monday, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Melissa Iyer Julian flatly rejected those claims, stating that the language of the proposed amendment wasn’t confusing to voters.
“The description accurately and fully communicated the initiative’s key provisions,” Julian wrote in her opinion. “This Court will not order its removal from the general statewide election ballot.”
Arizona Right to Life has yet to state whether they will appeal the order, though officials with Arizona for Abortion Access — the group that organized the petition drive — said they fully expected the case to continue into higher state courts.
The lawsuit from the anti-abortion group was “nothing more than false political talking points,” said Arizona for Abortion Access campaign spokesperson Dawn Penich. “If our opposition appeals, we are confident we will prevail just as we are confident we will win at the ballot box this November.”
Polling on the measure shows that it has the support of most Arizonans at this time. A CBS News survey back in May, for instance, found that 65 percent of voters backed enshrining abortion as a state constitutional right, with only 21 percent stating they were opposed to the idea.
The popularity of the proposal is also notable in the fact that Arizona for Abortion Access was able to obtain over 800,000 signatures in support of it appearing on the ballot — more than twice the number that was needed in order to have voters decide on it in November.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy