Skip to content Skip to footer

AOC Slams Democrats for Shutting Progressives Out of Policy Negotiations

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warned Friday that a one-time check of $600 is “not enough.”

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez speaks outside the Democratic National Committee headquarters on November 19, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Sunday voiced frustration with what she characterized as Democratic leaders’ efforts to shut progressives out of key policy negotiations, a message that came as the details of a roughly $900 billion coronavirus relief package began to slowly trickle out just ahead of an expected vote.

“One major difference between GOP and Dems is that [Republicans] leverage their right flank to gain policy concessions and generate enthusiasm, while Dems lock their left flank in the basement [because] they think that will make Republicans be nicer to them,” the New York Democrat tweeted, referencing Republican leaders’ decision to rally around Sen. Pat Toomey’s (R-Pa.) last-minute push to curtail the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending powers in the relief bill.

Toomey’s original provision — which Democrats slammed as an effort to sabotage the incoming Biden administration — was narrowed significantly in negotiations late Saturday, but the Pennsylvania Republican said Sunday that he is “very pleased” with the outcome.

Under the compromise agreement, according to the Wall Street Journal, “$429 billion previously provided to the Treasury Department to backstop losses in Fed lending programs would be revoked, and the Fed wouldn’t be able to replicate identical emergency lending programs next year without congressional approval. But the agreement wouldn’t prevent the Fed from starting other similar programs.”

As negotiations over much-needed coronavirus relief accelerated rapidly over the past week, Ocasio-Cortez and other progressives publicly aired their outrage at the exclusion of key priorities and the overall inadequacy of the package, which will ultimately be much smaller than even the pared-back version of the HEROES Act that the House passed in October. The total size of that package was around $2.2 trillion.

The relief legislation that’s expected to be unveiled and potentially passed Sunday includes $600 direct payments to many Americans and a $300 weekly boost to unemployment benefits — both significantly smaller than what Democratic leaders have supported in the past. Progressive lawmakers have pushed for direct payments of at least $1,200 per adult — a proposal supported by 88% of likely voters — and an unemployment boost of $600 a week.

The final package is also expected to include billions of dollars for vaccine distribution, rental assistance, and nutrition aid. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announced on the Senate floor Sunday evening that congressional leaders have reached an agreement on the legislation, but bill text has yet to be made public.

“We can finally report what our nation has needed to hear for a very long time: More help is on the way,” said McConnell, who stood in the way of additional relief for months.

While noting that progressives did succeed in getting direct payments back on the negotiating table after they were excluded from an earlier bipartisan proposal, Ocasio-Cortez warned Friday that a one-time check of $600 is “not enough.”

“We want $1,200 at least. And Republicans are fighting it back down to $600, which is really unfortunate,” said the New York Democrat. “We need to really make sure that we hold the Republican Party accountable for cutting people’s stimulus checks in half.”

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) also criticized the size of the direct payments, saying in an interview Sunday that “the truth of the matter is $600 will not even cover a month’s rent.”

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) expressed alarm that, with a potential vote just hours away, she still has not seen any legislative text.

“Still not a peep on language. It will probably be another multi-billion-dollar bill, without real debate, floor amendments, introduced and passed probably within hours,” Omar tweeted. “No time for the public input or objections. What a complete nightmarish example of representative democracy.”

Last week, as Common Dreams reported, Omar said it is “really quite shameful that we find ourselves negotiating a deal with such a small amount of money when we know just how devastated the American people are across our country.

“Think about it: in March, we were able to send $1,200 checks to people and give them $600 in unemployment insurance benefits,” Omar said. “And now we’re talking about possibly sending a one-time check, eight months later, of $600 and reducing that unemployment benefit to $300.”

Republican leaders and members of the Trump administration, meanwhile, are reportedly satisfied with the success they’ve had in pulling Democratic leaders down from their initial demand for a multi-trillion-dollar relief package, which economists say is necessary to bring the U.S. economy out of deep recession and provide adequate help to desperate Americans.

While the final package is not expected to include any form of liability shield for businesses — a Republican priority — it will also exclude additional direct aid to crisis-ravaged state and local governments.

“I couldn’t be more pleased where we landed this,” Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin reportedly said during a GOP conference call on Sunday.

Countdown is on: We have 9 days to raise $50,000

Truthout has launched a necessary fundraising campaign to support our work. Can you support us right now?

Each day, our team is reporting deeply on complex political issues: revealing wrongdoing in our so-called justice system, tracking global attacks on human rights, unmasking the money behind right-wing movements, and more. Your tax-deductible donation at this time is critical, allowing us to do this core journalistic work.

As we face increasing political scrutiny and censorship for our reporting, Truthout relies heavily on individual donations at this time. Please give today if you can.