Skip to content Skip to footer

AOC, Bernice King Slam McCarthy for Saying MLK Would Oppose Critical Race Theory

“The GOP would do well to stop banning books and start reading them,” wrote Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy speaks with reporters on May 19, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

Support justice-driven, accurate and transparent news — make a quick donation to Truthout today! 

Bernice King and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) sharply criticized House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-California) and the GOP this week for the right’s continued attack on what they perceive to be Critical Race Theory (CRT).

McCarthy tweeted a video claiming “Critical Race Theory goes against everything Martin Luther King Jr. taught us — to not judge others by the color of their skin,” thus completely misconstruing what CRT is really about. It is also a patent misrepresentation of what the civil rights leader believed and preached.

Such falsehoods, however, are not surprising coming as they do from a leader within a party that has never understood or cared to understand what Martin Luther King Jr. believed anyway and has cynically chosen to exploit CRT to promote its right-wing agenda.

Bernice King, the civil rights leader’s daughter, herself clarified as such in reply to McCarthy’s tweet on Monday. “Rep. McCarthy, I encourage you to study my father’s teachings and words well beyond the last lines of ‘I Have A Dream,’” she wrote. “This nation has yet to firmly commit to the intensive, multi-faceted work of eradicating racism against Black people. You should help with that.”

She then urged the Republican lawmaker to read her father’s final book before his assassination: Where Do We Go from Here: Chaos or Community?

Ocasio-Cortez pointed out the inaccuracy of McCarthy’s statement with a quote from Where Do We Go from Here.

“This quote of [Martin Luther] King’s is not from an early work. It was one of his last words,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote. “If all sorts of folks who claim ‘what MLK would do’ actually studied his work, they would understand he was a radical. And an anticapitalist, too.”

Taking Martin Luther King Jr.’s words out of context and misrepresenting his views is an unfortunate trend among both liberals and the right wing. This practice reached a high last year as the movement for Black lives surged across the country. As the Donald Trump White House egregiously twisted the civil rights leader’s words as an argument against the protests, many liberals wrung their hands over a tweet from Martin Luther King Jr. III, which seemed to validate the uprising.

“As my father explained during his lifetime, a riot is the language of the unheard,” wrote Martin Luther King Jr.’s son as protests were ramping up. As HuffPost catalogued at the time, many white liberals took umbrage at the tweet, saying that the civil rights leader wouldn’t have supported the modern uprisings for Black lives.

Across the country, meanwhile, as millions protested police brutality and murder, liberals were overly concerned about property damage incurred during the protests.

Martin Luther King Jr. was outspoken about the very liberals who claimed to hold his values but were “firm” in their denial of his politics and beliefs. As Ocasio-Cortez pointed out, Martin Luther King Jr. was a democratic socialist who once wrote that “capitalism has outlived its usefulness.”

“Martin Luther King, Jr was murdered for confronting white supremacy,” wrote Ocasio-Cortez. “Today GOP who are gutting the very Voting Rights Act King worked for want you to believe he’d support mass disenfranchisement and teaching of racial ignorance.”

She went on to point out the irony of Republicans trying to ban comprehensive education on the history of racism in the U.S. and cynically twisting the historic Black leader’s words to fit their own narrative.

“Ironically, the ineptitude that some Republicans demonstrate re: MLK proves that the multiracial history of the United States *isn’t* taught adequately enough in schools, and that we *should* teach it more deeply,” Ocasio-Cortez continued. “The GOP would do well to stop banning books and start reading them.”

Important Message: Please Read

For 25 years, Truthout has survived by publishing impactful investigative journalism and analysis; distributing full editions 365 days a year; and building a community of readers who support us with small, hard-earned donations.

Eighty percent of our $3 million yearly budget comes from small donors alone. Of those, 8,000 readers support us with monthly donations. Back in 2018, when Facebook decided to suppress the circulation of posts made by organizations, thereby cutting readers off from seeing many articles shared by the news organizations they had intentionally decided to follow, Truthout’s total traffic declined by 40 percent, as nearly all of our traffic from that platform disappeared.

Now, Google has recently rolled out its AI search bar, providing AI summaries instead of directing readers to our site. Google Search is our single largest source of traffic; it’s the route by which nearly one third of our readers find us. Much like in 2018, a shocking 40 percent of our Google traffic has disappeared overnight.

It will not be easy for Truthout to shoulder this blow. Nor will it be easy for our peers and collaborators — news sites that depend on traffic and aren’t bankrolled by large corporations.

If you can support Truthout with a donation today, you can help us resist the AI onslaught. Please give today.