The 2020 election, like the 2016 presidential race, was supposed to be a landslide victory for Democrats. Instead, Democrats lost a net dozen House seats and barely eked out victories in Congress and the White House, and a new analysis that’s been circulating around Democratic strategists, per The Washington Post, may explain why.
A report seen by Truthout by Way to Win on 2020 election strategies for both major parties found that Democrats focused largely on positive ads mentioning GOP members and touting a willingness to work across the aisle. Meanwhile, Republicans focused on attacking Democrats and painting them as extreme. The GOP gained a net 10 seats in the House and performed better than expected overall.
Democrats raised and spent more than Republicans overall, spending six times more than the GOP on positive ads that mentioned the Republicans and three and a half times more on ads about bipartisanship, according to the analysis. They also failed, Way to Win wrote, to talk about issues of concern to voters, like jobs and the economy.
Meanwhile, the GOP spent 10 times more than the Democrats on painting the opposing party as “radical” and “extremist.” Half of all of conservatives’ ads were based on rhetoric, using words like “AOC,” “socialism,” “defund” and “extreme” to describe Democrats, according to the analysis.
The problem isn’t necessarily that voters dislike the left’s ideas. “The analysis suggests that at least part of the problem — in 2020, anyway — was that Democrats failed to rebut those attacks head-on or to effectively make the case that the GOP is genuinely captured by its extremist elements in a way the Democratic Party simply is not,” wrote The Washington Post’s Greg Sargent.
This disparate messaging from the two major parties caused an unintended effect: Democrats ended up legitimizing the Republicans’ attacks on them because they were so insistent on bipartisanship. And, in so doing, Democrats lost a major opportunity to capitalize on the widespread disapproval of then-President Donald Trump, Way to Win concluded.
Early analyses of 2022 and beyond show dimming chances for Democrats to keep hold of the House. Way to Win says that Democrats need to reevaluate their strategies now in order to preempt losses and focus on talking about the extremism of the right.
“We should be painting them as the extreme outlier that they are,” Jenifer Fernandez Ancona, Way to Win vice president, told the Post.
Indeed, Republican state legislators have spent this year filing hundreds of extreme bills aimed at things like suppressing votes or attacking trans rights.
Progressives and some Democrats have grown increasingly frustrated with the Democratic establishment’s obsession with the illusion of bipartisanship with a party seemingly dead set on dismantling democracy. People like Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) have warned that, the longer Democrats drag out talks on things like the recent infrastructure bill, the more chance that the party will lose seats in 2022 and beyond.
Republicans, meanwhile, have completely rejected bipartisanship. Their stated goal is to obstruct Democrats at all costs.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.