A large storm system that affected parts of Central and Eastern Europe earlier this year was two times more likely due to the effects of human-made climate change, a new report indicates.
Storm Boris, which affected countries like Austria, Poland and Romania in mid-September, resulted in catastrophic floods that killed around two dozen people. In many cities, however, early warnings from weather forecasters allowed people time to prepare, and infrastructure improvements protected residents from the worst effects of the floods.
While such preparations are lifesaving, it is also essential to limit the amount of fossil fuels that are being put into the atmosphere to ensure that the climate crisis doesn’t worsen in the future, experts have said.
“Unless we stop burning fossil fuels, this rainfall and the associated flooding will only get worse,” said Friederike Otto, climatologist at the Imperial College London and a co-author of a report from World Weather Attribution, an international organization of scientists and meteorologists who study the role climate change plays in extreme weather events.
That organization’s analysis found that the massive rainfall during Storm Boris was twice as likely due to the effects of human-made climate change.
The storm produced between 7 and 20 percent more rain than a similar storm from the pre-industrial era, the report concluded.
The climate crisis has increased the intensity of such storms for a variety of reasons. In this storm’s case, for example, warmer temperatures resulted in more water in the atmosphere — for each degree Celsius that the earth is warmer than it was 100 years ago, the atmosphere holds around 7 percent more water, which intensifies storms.
“Temperature is increasing. The atmosphere can hold more moisture because it’s warmer. And then you can have more extreme rainfall,” Andreas Prein, a climate scientist based in Zurich, Switzerland, told NPR.
In the U.S., the climate crisis hasn’t played a major role in the 2024 election cycle, with neither major presidential candidate making the issue a pillar of their strategy. Republican nominee Donald Trump, however, has repeatedly downplayed the danger of the crisis, wrongly claiming earlier this year that rising sea levels would be beneficial, rather than catastrophic.
“Basically, you’ll have a little bit more beachfront property,” Trump said in one interview.
Although she has not discussed the climate crisis extensively at campaign events, the Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, says on her website that, if elected, she will advance “environmental justice, [protect] public lands and public health,” and “increase resilience to climate disasters.” However, her platform does not outline specific policies she plans on implementing.
Notably, while the Biden-Harris administration has allocated billions to addressing the climate crisis within the Inflation Reduction Act, the spending is far from the amount needed to address the gravity of the crisis, experts have said. Meanwhile, the administration has approved nearly twice the number of oil and gas permits for wells on federal land that Trump did during his first three years in the White House — and U.S. crude oil production reached an all-time high under Biden.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.