Skip to content Skip to footer

Americans Have Less Trust in Supreme Court Than Ever, Poll Finds

The proportion of people with “hardly any” confidence in the Supreme Court has shot up by 15 points since 2021.

Activists attend a press conference on Supreme Court ethics reform outside of the U.S. Capitol on May 02, 2023 in Washington, D.C.

As the public deals with the consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn 50 years of precedent protecting abortion rights across the country, trust in the Supreme Court has hit an all-time low, new polling by Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research at the University of Chicago finds.

The latest installment of the General Social Survey, which NORC has conducted since 1973, polled Americans between May and December of last year — the period immediately following the leak of the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

The polling found, perhaps unsurprisingly, that trust in the High Court took a nosedive last year. Just 18 percent of Americans said that they had a “great deal” of confidence in the Supreme Court last year, down from 26 percent in 2021. The amount of people with “only some” confidence dropped from 53 percent in 2021 to 46 percent in 2022.

Meanwhile, the proportion of people who said they had “hardly any” confidence in the Supreme Court exceeded the proportion who said they had a “great deal” of confidence for the first time in the poll’s history. A record 36 percent of respondents said they had “hardly any” trust in the Court, up 15 points from 2021.

Trust was lowest among Democrats. The proportion of Democrats with a “great deal” of confidence fell to a mere 8 percent in 2022, down from 25 percent the previous year. Confidence even fell among Republicans, despite the High Court being dominated by right-leaning justices, dropping from 31 percent in 2021 to 26 percent in 2022.

The polling demonstrates the crisis in confidence that the far right Supreme Court justices have brought onto the institution. Even aside from the questionable logic and legal basis behind the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling, the Court’s radical decision to yank away the right to bodily autonomy despite the longtime precedent set by Roe has yielded disastrous consequences for the public and people’s right to bodily autonomy, both for abortion seekers and for pregnant people seeking regular care.

The poll results also show how polarizing and unpopular the concept of banning abortion is when it becomes a reality. Opinions on abortion rights likely helped fuel the negative attitudes toward the Supreme Court; the polling finds that the proportion of people who agree that a person should be able to obtain a legal abortion for any reason rose above the proportion who do not agree for the first time two years ago. Now, 53 percent of adults believe that abortion access should be open to those who need it.

Previous polls on the Supreme Court after the fall of Roe have yielded similar results. A Gallup poll last September found that approval of the Supreme Court was at just 40 percent, tied with the record low first seen in 2021, while disapproval of the Court was at a record high of 58 percent. (The NORC poll did not ask explicitly about disapproval of the Court.)

These polls, however, were conducted before reporters uncovered a number of instances of extreme corruption from Supreme Court justices — specifically, from justice Clarence Thomas, who Chief Justice John Roberts has worked to shield in recent weeks.

The scandal surrounding Thomas has made the public aware of what has amounted to an open secret among judicial experts: that corruption is much more common among Court justices than the public knows, and that the justices have no interest in changing rules regarding corruption because it benefits them personally.

If the polling were conducted after these revelations, it may have found an even dimmer view of the Supreme Court.

Recent polling from The Economist and YouGov — conducted after the first bombshell ProPublica report on Thomas accepting lavish, undisclosed gifts from a Republican megadonor — found that nearly 6 in 10 Americans disapprove of Thomas’s choice to accept the gifts. Another poll, conducted around the same time by Demand Justice, found that 70 percent of Americans would support an investigation of ethical violations by Supreme Court justices.

Help us Prepare for Trump’s Day One

Trump is busy getting ready for Day One of his presidency – but so is Truthout.

Trump has made it no secret that he is planning a demolition-style attack on both specific communities and democracy as a whole, beginning on his first day in office. With over 25 executive orders and directives queued up for January 20, he’s promised to “launch the largest deportation program in American history,” roll back anti-discrimination protections for transgender students, and implement a “drill, drill, drill” approach to ramp up oil and gas extraction.

Organizations like Truthout are also being threatened by legislation like HR 9495, the “nonprofit killer bill” that would allow the Treasury Secretary to declare any nonprofit a “terrorist-supporting organization” and strip its tax-exempt status without due process. Progressive media like Truthout that has courageously focused on reporting on Israel’s genocide in Gaza are in the bill’s crosshairs.

As journalists, we have a responsibility to look at hard realities and communicate them to you. We hope that you, like us, can use this information to prepare for what’s to come.

And if you feel uncertain about what to do in the face of a second Trump administration, we invite you to be an indispensable part of Truthout’s preparations.

In addition to covering the widespread onslaught of draconian policy, we’re shoring up our resources for what might come next for progressive media: bad-faith lawsuits from far-right ghouls, legislation that seeks to strip us of our ability to receive tax-deductible donations, and further throttling of our reach on social media platforms owned by Trump’s sycophants.

We’re preparing right now for Trump’s Day One: building a brave coalition of movement media; reaching out to the activists, academics, and thinkers we trust to shine a light on the inner workings of authoritarianism; and planning to use journalism as a tool to equip movements to protect the people, lands, and principles most vulnerable to Trump’s destruction.

We urgently need your help to prepare. As you know, our December fundraiser is our most important of the year and will determine the scale of work we’ll be able to do in 2025. We’ve set two goals: to raise $81,000 in one-time donations and to add 1250 new monthly donors by midnight on December 31.

Today, we’re asking all of our readers to start a monthly donation or make a one-time donation – as a commitment to stand with us on day one of Trump’s presidency, and every day after that, as we produce journalism that combats authoritarianism, censorship, injustice, and misinformation. You’re an essential part of our future – please join the movement by making a tax-deductible donation today.

If you have the means to make a substantial gift, please dig deep during this critical time!

With gratitude and resolve,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy