Skip to content Skip to footer

Aid Groups Issue Grave Warnings as Trump Considers Major Escalation of US Military Role in Yemen

Aid groups warned that US support for a Saudi-led takeover of Yemen’s main humanitarian port “would destroy the lifeline to millions.”

A girl walks by a US drone graffiti painted on a wall during a campaign against using US drones in Yemen on May 31, 2018, in Sana’a, Yemen.

In a “horrifying” development that international aid groups and independent critics warn could worsen what is already the world’s most devastating humanitarian crisis, the Trump administration is reportedly considering a plan to greatly expand the US military’s role in Yemen in an effort to help Saudi-backed forces seize the country’s main humanitarian aid port.

According to the Wall Street Journal—which first reported the details of the plan on Sunday—the Trump White House “is weighing an appeal from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for direct US support” for Saudi-forces that are closing in on the port city of Hodeidah, where nearly 80 percent of all humanitarian aid and food arrives. Hodeidah is currently controlled by Houthi rebels.

“Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has asked for a quick assessment of the UAE’s plea for assistance such as surveillance drone flights to help a Saudi-led coalition retake Hodeidah,” the Journal noted.

“The push for Hodeidah is likely to exacerbate an already catastrophic security situation in Yemen,” Francois Moreillon, head of the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation in Yemen, told the Journal in response to the White House’s reported plan.

Amid reports that Saudi-backed forces are now just miles away from Hodeidah after taking over a nearby town, Norway Refugee Council chief Jan Egeland additionally warned that an attack on the port city “would destroy the lifeline to millions.”

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.)—one of the few lawmakers from either side of the aisle to speak out forcefully against U.S. complicity in the Saudi-led assault on Yemen—ridiculed the Trump administration’s apparent consideration of a plan that could further devastate a nation in which millions are already on the brink of famine.

While the plan for a larger US military role in Yemen has not been finalized, the Journal reports that some US officials are eager to provide further military assistance to Saudi-led forces in Yemen.

“We have folks who are frustrated and ready to say: ‘Let’s do this. We’ve been flirting with this for a long time,” an anonymous Trump administration official told the Journal. “Something needs to change the dynamic, and if we help the Emiratis do it better, this could be good.”

The possibility of deeper US involvement in Yemen comes just weeks after the New York Times revealed that US special forces have been helping train Saudi soldiers along the Yemeni border—a secret operation that was not publicly debated or approved by Congress.

“I have strong concerns that the Trump administration is getting the US more involved in a war in Yemen without congressional authorization,” Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) warned in response to the Times report. “We must prevent the US from getting dragged into another never-ending war.”

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.