Skip to content Skip to footer

Abortion Clinic Sues West Virginia Over Anti-Abortion Law

The law is “inflicting irreparable harm” on people in the state who are seeking abortion services.

West Virginia's statehouse is pictured in Charleston, West Virginia.

An abortion clinic in West Virginia is suing the state medical board over an anti-abortion bill, passed into law last fall, that bans the procedure in nearly every circumstance.

Women’s Health Center of West Virginia, along with its head physician (whose name is listed as John Doe in the lawsuit) describes multiple aspects of the law as “irrational,” adding that the law unconstitutionally restricts people’s right to make decisions about their own reproductive health.

“Every person deserves to access the critical care they need, but this law pushes essential abortion care out of reach,” Katie Quiñonez, Women’s Health Center of West Virginia executive director, said in a statement. “With each day this ban remains in effect, we are forced to turn patients away because politicians took away their power to make the best medical decisions for themselves during pregnancy.”

Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, deputy director of the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project, which is assisting the clinic and the doctor in the lawsuit, also condemned the law.

“The cruel and medically unjustified provisions of this law effectively push care out of reach entirely, and the so-called exceptions are just an illusion. No one should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term against their will and we’ll continue fighting until everyone can get the care they need — regardless of where they live,” Kolbi-Molinas said.

The West Virginia law, which was passed shortly after the federal Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last summer, bans abortion at all stages of pregnancy, only allowing exceptions for rape or incest, or to save the life of a pregnant person.

If a person becomes pregnant as a result of rape, they must obtain an abortion within eight weeks, a timeframe in which many people may not even be aware they are pregnant. They are also required to alert police to their sexual assault before they can get an abortion. The law only allows children who are victims of rape to get an abortion within 14 weeks of becoming pregnant.

The law also requires abortions to be performed in a hospital or by a doctor who has hospital admitting privileges, which has never been required by the state at any point in history, either before or after Roe, the lawsuit says.

“At no point did the Legislature consider or receive any testimony or evidence linking the Hospitalization or Privileges Requirements to any legitimate interest in the health or safety of abortion patients,” the lawsuit states, noting that one lawmaker even “acknowledged their purpose was to ‘shut down’ [the clinic] as the only remaining provider of abortion services in the state.”

The health clinic is asking for courts to block the law and for an immediate injunction on the law’s enforcement while the outcome of the lawsuit is being determined.

The law is “inflicting irreparable harm on the ability of [Women’s Health Center of West Virginia] to fulfill its professional mission and purpose to provide reproductive health care that respects patients’ choices, including the decision not to continue a pregnancy to term,” the lawsuit adds.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.