A new Pew poll finds Americans are at record levels of isolationism, although large numbers are unilateralist and a plurality see China as the world’s leading economic power.
President Obama clearly didn’t factor public opinion into his decision, announced earlier this week, to send 30,000 additional American troops to Afghanistan. The plan manages to have opposition from every persuasion including theunhappy anti-war base that elected Obama last year as well as Republicans who fault the size of the deployment, the exit strategy and the timeit took the president to arrive at it all.
If he did want to know, however, what people are thinking, an in-depth new opinion poll from the Pew Research Center and theCouncil on Foreign Relationslooks particularly grim: Not only are a plurality of Americans skeptical of success in Afghanistan, they’re feeling more isolationist than they have in four decades of the polling.
Forty-nine percent agreed that “the U.S. should mind its own business and let others get along the best they can on their own” — the highest such mark since the quadrennial survey began in 1964 (when 18 percent of those polled agreed with the statement). Unfortunately, there’s no apples-to-apples poll with the pre-World War II Depression era when isolationism was also rampant.
That current finding casts a somber backdrop to Obama’s trip next week to accept the Nobel Peace Prize; he’ll be honored for inroads outside of the U.S. when such engagement is at its lowest priority back home.
Andrew Kohut, president of the Pew Research Center, and James Lindsay, director of studies for the CFR, blamed several factors for the spike in isolationism, from the economic crisis to wariness with the Bush-era style of assertive foreign policy.
“That clearly reflects in great part people feeling burned by the last eight years,” Lindsay said.
But that’s not to say people have embraced Obama’s alternative. Unilateralist views are also at an all-time high in the poll, with 44 percent agreeing with a statement that sounds straight out of the Bush Doctrine: “Since the U.S. is the most powerful nation in the world, we should go our own way in international matters, not worrying too much about whether other countries agree with us or not.”
Forty-seven percent (including 72 percent of Republicans) also said Obama is not tough enough in his handling of foreign policy, a sentiment that likely speaks more to conflicts with Iran, North Korea and in the Middle East than with Afghanistan.
The survey contrasted the views of 2,000 adults in the general public with 600 opinion-leaders who are members of the CFR (all were polled in late October and early November, before Obama’s Tuesday troop announcement). In one instance, the groups differed widely: 53 percent of the public continue to view China’s emerging power as a threat to the United States, while CFR members cast the relationship in much less adversarial terms, with 58 percent saying China will be a more important ally in the future.
Fear among the public may stem from another precedent — for the first time, a plurality of Americans thinks the world’s leading economic power is not the U.S., but China.
The survey mines what in some cases look like contradictory impulses: rejecting Bush’s foreign policy legacy but supporting unilateralism, urging disengagement while faulting Obama’s toughness. What Kohut sees in it all is a sense of uneasiness.
“My takeaway at the end is I think this survey shows both the public and opinion leadership groups are apprehensive and uncertain about America’s place in world,” Kohut said. “Given the variety of economic and geopolitical challenges to the U.S., I guess that’s not unreasonable.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.