Skip to content Skip to footer

673 Books Removed From Orange County Classrooms to Comply With Florida Laws

“This is yet another disastrous consequence of Florida’s disastrous education policies,” one free speech advocate said.

Orange County school district pulled 673 books from classrooms this year in fear of violating Florida’s far right laws banning materials that supposedly include “sexual conduct” from schools, according to analysis by the Florida Freedom to Read Project.

These laws, HB 1069 and HB 1467, require media specialists, or teachers with library training, to review and approve books in classrooms and libraries and restrict LGBTQ content and material on reproductive health.

“This is yet another disastrous consequence of Florida’s disastrous education policies,” Kasey Meehan, director of PEN America’s Freedom to Read project, said in a statement. “Hundreds of books have now been removed from Orange County shelves under HB 1069, and we continue to be alarmed by the magnitude and scale of censorship following the implementation of this law.”

The books removed from classroom shelves include classics like “Beloved,” “The Color Purple,” and “Madame Bovary.”

“It’s creating this culture of fear within our media specialists and even teachers who just want to have a library in their classrooms, so kids have access,” former teacher Castor Dentel told the Orlando Sentinel.

The 673 books were removed from teacher’s classrooms, not school libraries. The district has not yet said how many books were removed from libraries and classrooms in total to comply with the new laws.

According to a recent PEN America report, book bans increased across the country by 33 percent in the 2022-2023 school year, with 40 percent of all book bans occurring in Florida. PEN America found that nearly half of all school districts in the state had book bans and that 1,406 books were banned in total.

“We see Florida as almost setting the map for where other states could go and certainly we hope that efforts to oppose book bans in Florida will also help us in how we think about pushing back against book bans before they ramp up to this scale in other states,” Meehan told the Nebraska Examiner in October.

In May, PEN America sued the Escambia County School District, asserting that the school district’s removal of books due to their portrayal of race or LGBTQ identity violated the First Amendment.

“The targeted book removals we are seeing in Escambia County are blatantly unconstitutional attempts to silence and stigmatize,” Nadine Farid Johnson, managing director of PEN America Washington and Free Expression Programs, said in a statement. “The government should not foster censorship by proxy, allowing one person to decide what ideas are out of bounds for all.”

In July, Charlotte County Superintendent Mark Vianello ordered district libraries to remove all LGBTQ books and teaching materials in order to comply with the state’s “Don’t Say Gay” laws. When asked whether students could bring personal books with LGBTQ themes into the classroom, Vianello said,“These characters and themes cannot exist.”

“Removing all representation of LGBTQ+ people in literature goes against our very principles of living in a free and just, pluralistic society,” the Florida Freedom to Read Project said in a statement.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.