At least 13 other states are looking into implementing laws similar to a provision in the voter suppression package recently passed in Georgia that severely restricts local election officials’ authority over how elections are conducted.
The law passed last month by Republicans in Georgia opens floodgates where there were previously checks and balances in the state’s election system. It removes the secretary of state as the head of elections, allows the Republican-controlled legislature to fill the election board with handpicked officials, and then gives the board sweeping powers to replace local election officials with their own chosen superintendents.
It also grants Georgians unlimited challenges to any voters’ eligibility — something that right-wing groups tried and failed to do to voters of color in the state in 2020 in an attempt to get hundreds of thousands of ballots thrown out. Under the new law, it’s easier for those sorts of challenges to succeed as they would be considered by the very county boards whose members are appointed by the Republican legislature.
Now over a dozen states are considering similar bills, FiveThirtyEight reports, some of which criminalize local election officials for stepping out of line. Local election officials were “one of the last lines of defense,” The New York Times wrote, against former President Donald Trump’s unfounded challenges to the results of the 2020 election.
In Iowa, Republicans passed a voter suppression package making it a felony for election officials to fail to perform their duties or follow orders from the secretary of state. It also imposes a $10,000 fine on officials for “technical infractions.”
In Arkansas, a bill in committee allows the state’s election board to take over the administration of local elections, similar to the Georgia bill. Another four bills have passed through one chamber of the legislature that give state politicians more control over how elections are run. The laws allow partisan county election boards to dictate how elections are run and bans the mailing of unsolicited absentee ballot applications, among other things.
States like Tennessee, Connecticut, New York, Arizona, New Jersey, and more are all considering measures to prohibit election officials from sending unsolicited applications for mail-in ballots, unsolicited ballots or both.
The Texas House recently passed a bill through committee that makes it a felony for election officials to send unsolicited applications to vote by mail or even encourage people to file an application to vote by mail. A separate bill that passed the State Senate would also bar local election officials from encouraging people to vote by mail and would implement fines on election officials who fail to remove a voter from the voter rolls within a month.
Something of particular concern in Texas is that the legislature has also kept major election bills under wraps by not posting them online for a reasonable amount of time for public review. Houston Chronicle’s Jeremy Wallace wrote on Twitter that Texas state legislators are making a habit of heavily amending election bills and passing them without posting the final bills for the public to view.
This makes it harder for Wallace to report on what’s in the bills, he explained. “But the real problem is everyday Texans have no way to read what is being voted out of committees and voted off the floor when this happens,” Wallace wrote. “This is not normal. In other State Legislatures I’ve covered over the years, there can be a printing delay. But I’ve never had to wait 5 days to see what a committee passed out.”
These bills are all part of a wave of bills targeting elections that have been filed across the country. The Brennan Center reported at the beginning of this month that 361 bills have been filed just since the beginning of this year. Many of the bills are Republican led and are targeted at restricting voting for Black voters and other nonwhite communities.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy