The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit has agreed to the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) request to expedite its challenge to the legality of having a special master review documents that were retrieved in August from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach, Florida.
The announcement from the 11th Circuit Court came on Wednesday. If the court eventually sides with the DOJ and determines that a special master was improperly granted or is unnecessary, it could result in a quicker DOJ decision on whether or not to charge Trump with crimes relating to his improper transfer of government materials (including hundreds of classified documents) to his residence upon exiting the White House.
Trump’s lawyers had argued against the DOJ’s claims that a special master was unnecessary in a brief they submitted earlier this week. Had the court sided with Trump, the process to determine the need for a special master would likely have lasted well into next year.
The process of determining the legality of involving a special master begins next week, according to a timetable from the 11th Circuit Court. The DOJ must submit a brief arguing why it believes a special master isn’t needed by October 14, while Trump’s lawyers must submit a brief by November 10. If the DOJ chooses to respond to that brief, it must submit its response within a week.
A panel of judges randomly selected within the 11th Circuit Court will decide when oral arguments will commence at a later time. The timetable laid out by the court suggests that it is possible arguments will be heard before the end of the year.
District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, initially agreed to appoint a special master in early September upon Trump’s request more than two weeks after the documents were retrieved from his home. Many legal experts believe the appointment was unnecessary, as the DOJ already had a separate team of researchers determining whether or not the documents were privileged. Some have speculated that Trump’s request for a special master was merely a delay tactic in order to better prepare his legal team’s arguments in the face of what appears to be impending charges against him.
Cannon’s order to appoint a special master prevented the DOJ from examining all of the documents they had retrieved from Trump’s estate. In a recent order from the 11th Circuit Court, the department was granted the ability to look at items marked as classified. Trump is appealing that ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, but he is widely expected to lose that appeal.
Though the DOJ is now allowed to look at the classified documents, the department stated in its brief why it believes examining all of the material is important. It “may shed light on, for example, how the materials bearing classified markings were transferred to plaintiff’s residence,” the DOJ said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.