Nearly one year to the day that the U.S. Supreme Court overturned federal abortion rights protections by upending precedent established in the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, new polling shows that most Americans are opposed to the anti-abortion ruling.
The survey, a CBS News/YouGov poll conducted on June 14-17, was published just days before the first anniversary of the Dobbs v. Women’s Health decision.
A draft of the Dobbs decision was leaked in May 2022, a month before the ruling was handed down. When the ruling was officially published by the right-leaning Supreme Court on June 24 of last year, millions of people across the country demonstrated against the decision.
The new poll shows that most Americans maintain their opposition to the ruling a year later.
According to the poll, 56 percent of respondents said they disapprove of the Roe overturn, while just 44 percent said they approve.
Fifty-seven percent of Americans believe that overturning Roe was bad for the country. Among those who said as much, 86 percent said the ruling was bad because it put the health and lives of people who can become pregnant at risk, with 81 percent saying the ruling was harmful because it struck down a recognized constitutional right. Seventy-eight percent said the ruling was bad for the country because it allowed states to restrict abortion access.
Forty-six percent of respondents said being pregnant in the U.S. has become more dangerous as a result of the Court’s decision.
Within a survey of OBGYNs published earlier this week by the Kaiser Family Foundation, more than two-thirds (68 percent) said the Dobbs ruling has made it more difficult to respond to pregnancy-related emergencies. Forty-four percent of OBGYNs said their “decision-making autonomy” has worsened since the Dobbs decision. In states where abortion has been banned or severely restricted, that number goes up to 6 in 10 OBGYNs.
Meanwhile, there have been numerous reports of people being denied access to abortion in medical emergencies since the Roe overturn. In one case, a woman in Tennessee couldn’t obtain an abortion even after her pregnancy was no longer viable and posed a great risk to her health because health care providers were unsure whether she met the standards required to access a life-saving abortion under the law.
That woman, Mayron Hollis, was forced to have a hysterectomy.
“I didn’t want the hysterectomy. But they said that was the only way that they could stop the bleeding to help me, so I didn’t have a choice,” Hollis told ABC News.
Since Roe’s demise, a number of states have enacted stricter laws on abortion, either through automatic trigger laws — which enabled pre-Roe statutes that were still on the books to go back into effect — or through new laws passed by current state legislatures. These laws have created barriers to the procedure and confusion for doctors, who are unsure, in many cases, whether or not they can proceed with a life-saving abortion, a roadblock that puts their patients at risk.
Total abortion bans and bans on the procedure from six weeks of pregnancy onward currently exist in 14 states across the U.S., while a handful of other states have enacted bans ranging from 12 weeks to 20 weeks. In 25 states plus Washington, D.C., abortion is legal without any weekly restrictions.
Some of those states have passed new laws affirming or expanding abortion protections. Over the past year, some state residents have sought to use the political tools available to them to keep abortion rights intact. Voters in California, Michigan and Vermont, for example, have passed ballot initiatives cementing abortion rights in those states’ constitutions, while efforts to deny abortion rights through ballot initiatives have failed in Kentucky and Kansas. Pro-abortion organizers plan to push similar initiatives in other states in the near future.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 275 new monthly donors in the next 3 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy