In today’s On the News segment: Recently released documents show that since Fukushima, our nuclear regulators have been playing down the risk of a similar incident happening in the US; homeowners want energy choices – and for once, that’s not just a Republican talking point; four new man-made gases are destroying our ozone layer and intensifying the effects of climate change; and more.
TRANSCRIPT:
Thom Hartmann here – on the best of the rest of….science & green news…..
You need to know this. Last week marked the third anniversary of the earthquake and tsunami that devastated the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant in Japan. And, recently released documents show that since then, our nuclear regulators have been playing down the risk of a similar incident happening in the U.S. Emails obtained via a Freedom of Information Request show that the higher-ups at the Nuclear Regulatory Agency told staff to hide information from reporters, to keep quiet about NRC scientists studying risk at US plants, and to change the subject when media asked what a worst-case scenario in our country could look like. At the very same time they were down-playing the risk to Americans, experts at the agency were questioning U.S. safety standards and feverishly working to determine if the NRC needed to implement new rules for nuclear plants in our nation. According to nuclear experts, rules aren’t enough to prevent a disaster like Fukushima from happening in the U.S. Kevin Kamps of Beyond Nuclear pointed out that there are 23 nuclear plants in our nation that have exact replicas of the nuclear reactor at Fukushima Daiichi, and eight other reactors are similarly designed. These plants, and many others, won’t suddenly be safe if the Nuclear Regulatory Commission institutes a few weak regulations. Our regulators and lawmakers seemed to have learned nothing from Fukushima except how to hide the risk of a similar disaster. It’s time that regulators own up to the real dangers of nuclear energy, and it’s time that Americans stand up and say “No Nukes.”
U.S. homeowners want energy choices – and for once, that’s not just a Republican talking point. A new poll of more than 1,400 homeowners found that people want options when it comes to how they power their homes, and they don’t want utility monopolies dictating how they get their energy. In fact, 62 percent of those surveyed are interested in solar power for their homes, and 88 percent support renewable energy in general. Even 80 percent of the Republicans in that poll say that utility companies shouldn’t block or interfere with a homeowner’s desire to make the switch to solar. However, that’s exactly what some energy companies around our country are doing. Half of the homeowners questioned are interested in backup power for their homes, but utilities are standing in the way. Lyndon Rive, CEO of SolarCity, said, “It’s interesting to see what utilities are doing to slow down that deployment from long inter-connection times to outrageous connection fees.” That’s because utility companies don’t want consumers switching to solar. It’s no longer a partisan issue, Americans want the choice to go green, and they’re demanding that utility companies don’t stand in their way.
Four new man-made gases are destroying our ozone layer and intensifying the effects of climate change. According to a new report from the journal Nature Geoscience, these new gases never appeared in our atmosphere before the 1960s, and they’re made up of chemicals commonly found in air-conditioning, aerosol cans, and other refrigerants. In recent years, scientists have said that the hole in our ozone layer was finally stabilizing, although it may take another six decades for it to fully recover. The researchers in this latest study say, “The identification of these four new gases is very worrying as they will contribute to the destruction of the ozone layer.” These gases can be up to six-times more potent than greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, and their discovery reminds us that the ozone layer is sill important news. It can take decades for dangerous gases like this to breakdown in our atmosphere, and we must do more to control emissions.
The natural gas industry wants to exploit the crisis in Ukraine. Not only is it impractical to export tons of this toxic substance around the world, it’s a really bad idea for our environment. As the situation in Ukraine began to unfold, industry-friendly lawmakers in the US almost immediately began calling for more natural gas drilling, but they don’t accept – or choose to ignore – the facts. According to Michael Levi of the Council on Foreign Relations, “decisions about whom to export to and import from are made by commercial entities, not by governments.” In addition, the natural gas infrastructure in that region isn’t even set up to handle a surge of new gas. This idea just doesn’t make sense, and multiple studies make it clear that increasing natural gas production is the exact opposite of what we should be doing to fight climate change. Natural gas is mostly methane, which is way more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. And, there is already a ton of it leaking into our environment. More fracking won’t help us – and it won’t help the people of Ukraine. That’s a gas-industry talking point, and we have to make sure that our lawmakers don’t buy it.
And finally… Over the weekend, thousands of people came out to say “no” to fracking in California. The rally was organized by the group Californians Against Fracking, and it’s being called the largest rally of its kind in state history. More than 80 environmental and health organizations took part in the protest, and call on Governor Jerry Brown to ban natural gas drilling in his state. In the days before the protest, environmental groups released a report linking California earthquakes to increases in natural gas drilling, and others pointed to health concerns and climate change. In addition, as that state continues to suffer from one of their worst droughts in history, many anti-fracking groups argue that limited water resources should be off limits to the natural gas industry. From earthquakes to health to the environment to drinking water, there are numerous reasons to put an end to this dangerous process. Thousands of people came out to express their concerns, and it’s time that Governor Jerry Brown and all the California lawmakers start listening.
And that’s the way it is for the week of March 17, 2014 – I’m Thom Hartmann, on Science & Green News.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy