Skip to content Skip to footer

A Divided Nation: As Trump Wins Electoral College, Clinton Wins Popular Vote

John Nichols, political writer for The Nation, argues Donald Trump’s victory is the result of an election process that does not reflect the popular will.

John Nichols, political writer for The Nation, argues Donald Trump’s upset victory to win at least 270 Electoral College votes and become U.S. president is the result of an election process that does not reflect the popular will, as his rival Hillary Clinton appears set to win the popular vote. “America has a lousy, messed-up election system, and we count votes really slow,” he notes. “What will turn out to be the reality … is that Hillary Clinton will actually beat Donald Trump by perhaps the largest margin that any loser beat a winner by in the popular vote. It will grow quite a bit.” Nichols notes President Obama’s popular vote tally grew from 225,000 on election night to 5 million, and says he expects mass protests. His new article is titled “These Election Results Will Define America.”

TRANSCRIPT

AMY GOODMAN: This is Democracy Now!, democracynow.org, The War and Peace Report. I’m Amy Goodman. Yes, Donald Trump has been elected the 45th president of the United States, defeating Hillary Clinton in a stunning upset that reverberated around the world. Trump carried at least 279 Electoral College votes to Clinton’s 218, although Trump appears to have narrowly lost the popular vote.

To talk more about Donald Trump’s triumph, we’re joined now by a number of guests.

John Nichols is with us, political writer for The Nation. His new article, “These Election Results Will Define America.”

Linda Sarsour is joining us, director of the first Muslim online organizing platform, MPower Change, co-founder of Muslim Democratic Club of New York.

Jose Antonio Vargas is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and filmmaker. He’s the founder and editor of #EmergingUS and founder of Define American. He famously came out of the shadows in 2011 in The New York Times Magazine with his story, “My Life as an Undocumented Immigrant.”

Nikole Hannah-Jones is with us, award-winning reporter covering racial injustice at The New York Times Magazine.

And joining us on the phone, longtime investigative journalist Wayne Barrett, who’s been reporting on Donald Trump for decades. His 1991 biography of Donald Trump was just republished in paperback with the title Trump: The Greatest Show on Earth: The Deals, the Downfall, the Reinvention.

John Nichols, let’s begin with you.

JOHN NICHOLS: Well, let me offer a minor corrective to one of the things you said. You said that Hillary Clinton is narrowly ahead in the popular vote. America has a lousy, messed-up election system, and we count votes really slow. What will turn out to be the reality, because at least a third of the California vote is still uncounted — it looks to be, when I look at those numbers—is that Hillary Clinton will actually beat Donald Trump by perhaps the largest margin that any loser beat a winner by in the popular vote. It will grow quite a bit. And I followed this in 2012. Barack Obama’s win grew from the night of victory from 225,000 to 5 million. And so, what we have in our country today is a reality that we have a new president, who in most countries in the world would not be president, because in most countries in the world the person who wins the popular vote becomes president. We should begin with that, not to comfort ourselves overly much, but to recognize that we have had a result that is a product of an election system that is a mess and that was designed a very long time ago to produce results that didn’t necessarily reflect the popular will. For those of us who are unsettled by Donald Trump’s election, that’s an important beginning point.

One other element I would throw in, though. I’ve covered the new Republican Party. This is the Republican Party that came into existence after Barack Obama’s election. This Republican Party understands that when it gets power, it uses it quickly. And this is an important thing. Donald Trump will assume the presidency with a Republican House and Senate. If we look at the pattern from the states from 2011, they will move very rapidly on elements of their agenda. And I would counsel that Donald Trump was elected on the most right-wing platform in the history of the Republican Party, a platform that is filled with economic and social proposals that are more strongly backed by his congressional caucuses than by him. So, I would simply suggest that we are at a radical pivot point in this country. And on the eve of the election, Newt Gingrich said that he anticipated, if Donald Trump was elected, there would be mass protests and a great division in this country. I would suggest that that is very likely to be the case and, frankly, very necessary, because we cannot say to a man who lost the popular vote that we accept your radical agenda.

Unlike mainstream media, we’re not capitulating to Trump.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.