Last night didn’t go that well for Bernie Sanders. Despite high hopes for a strong showing in the so-called “Acela primaries,” he managed to win just one of the five states at play — Rhode Island. As a result, his path to the Democratic nomination, although still open, just got a lot slimmer.
But contrary to what you might hear on the mainstream corporate media, Bernie’s win in tiny Rhode Island is actually a pretty big deal. It wasn’t the last gasp from a candidate who’s well past his sell-by date that establishment types are making it out to be. It was a wake-up call to Democrats everywhere about what they need to do to expand their party.
You see, there’s a reason why Bernie Sanders did so well in Rhode Island: it has an open primary, and Bernie Sanders often does really, really well in open primaries. Including Rhode Island, most of the actual primaries he’s won this election season have been open contests or virtually open contests.
This isn’t a coincidence. It’s the logical result of the strong support Bernie has among the independent voters who play a big role in deciding open contests, because independents can actually vote in them.
Some establishment Democrats have shrugged off Bernie’s rapport among independents as yet another example of how he’s not a “true Democrat.” The way they see it, he’s just a Johnny-come-lately who only has support among other Johnny-come-latelies who couldn’t care less about the future of the Democratic Party.
See more news and opinion from Thom Hartmann at Truthout here.
This kind of thinking is so short-sighted and downright counterproductive it just boggles the mind.
Bernie’s success in open primaries and among independents isn’t a bad thing; it’s exactly what the Democratic Party needs.
Independents account for 42 percent of the national electorate, and while doing well among Democratic loyalists is well and good during primary season, a good general election candidate needs to be able to win at least some of the independent vote. An even better general election candidate would win the majority of the independent vote.
And here’s the thing: Bernie isn’t just winning over a key voting demographic; he’s energizing people to come out and participate in the political process as Democrats. So if the Democratic Party were logical, it would capitalize on Bernie’s rapport with independents, as well as young people, and try to replicate it across the board.
An obvious starting point would be adopting Bernie’s positions on things like health care, Social Security, affordable higher education college, no more wars and taking on Wall Street.
It’s these positions, more than anything else, that have drawn people to the Bernie Sanders campaign, and it’s why his campaign has done so well despite all the naysayers in the establishment passing it off as “just another protest campaign.”
But adopting Bernie’s policies is only one part of what Democrats need to do capitalize on his campaign’s success. They also need to recreate what’s made that success possible, and that means making all primaries (and caucuses) open contests.
Despite what some people might think about how important is to “have Democrats elect Democrats,” closed primaries arguably hurt Democrats in the long run. They artificially limit the party’s reach and don’t give candidates any incentive whatsoever to win over anyone other than party loyalists.
Open primaries, on the other hand, do the exact opposite.
They expand the party’s reach and give candidates a real incentive to win over people who, for one reason or another, don’t feel comfortable aligning themselves with a political party. They also make it a lot easier for voters to take part in the political process because they’re a lot easier to understand: if you’re registered to vote, you can vote, regardless of the party you belong to. It’s that simple.
In fact, one way to synthesize open and closed primaries would be to have independent voters declare a party affiliation on election day at the polls to vote on that party’s ballot, and then they’re automatically registered with that party until they change their affiliation.
As the primary season winds to a close and we head towards the general election, Democrats should be optimistic. No matter who’s the nominee, the Sanders campaign has revealed an easy way for the Democratic Party to expand its base and become more democratic.
It’s time for open primaries across the board. Let’s just hope the DNC is smart enough to realize that and make it happen.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.