“Hope and change!”
Those were Barack Obama’s magic words to rally progressives and young people in the United States behind his historic 2008 campaign.
And based on Obama’s rhetoric and actions before 2008 – as a community organizer, as a state senator and as a US Senator – everyone had reason to believe that his campaign represented a rebirth of progressive values in the US.
That’s what people campaigned for; that’s what people voted for.
But it’s not what we got.
See more news and opinion from Thom Hartmann at Truthout here.
And that was pretty clear already in 2011 as Barack Obama ran for re-election against Mitt Romney.
He promised health care for all – we got a health care exchange market that’s hugely profitable for insurance companies.
He ran as a friend of labor – but he hasn’t done much to protect labor from governors like Scott Walker, who systematically stripped away collective bargaining rights in Wisconsin during Obama’s terms.
He didn’t close Gitmo, he didn’t end the Patriot Act and he didn’t end the wars in the Middle East.
Granted, Obama was blocked at every turn ever since his inauguration – when Republicans in Congress plotted to make him a one-term president instead of getting anything done.
But those are still the issues that Americans care about – and those are the issues that Obama built his career on and campaigned on.
Seriously – take a look at Obama speaking back in 2003 at an AFL-CIO event.
That’s Barack Obama as a state senator just over 10 years ago, speaking at an event hosted by the largest federation of unions in the United States – promoting universal health care.
But by the time he was running seriously against Hillary Clinton in 2008, he had changed his tune slightly.
Even then, his answer was hedged in such a way that he could appeal both to the centrist “pragmatic” democrats and still give the progressive wing hope.
Which was a smart campaign move – because Obama was never going to out-centrist Hillary – and he needed the progressive vote to win the primary.
But by the time he was up for re-election in 2012 – a lot of progressives were so turned off that they didn’t even turn out to vote, or they voted for third party candidates – and that nearly cost him re-election against Mitt Romney.
Because voters wanted Barack Obama to bring about a political revolution, the voters’ faith in Barack Obama wasn’t based on “hope AND change.”
It was based on “hope FOR change” – real reform of our rigged political and economic systems.
He appealed to people who were tired of 30-plus years of Republican shenanigans and Reaganism, and who didn’t want to hand the presidency from the Bush dynasty to the Clinton dynasty.
He appealed to people who wanted a Washington outsider – one who got the troubles of the working class – and understood that the system is rigged against the average American.
Just take a look at his remarks in 2007 to the SEIU and the Center for American Progress.
He had the message right – and he had progressives and the US worker on his side.
And he sounded a lot like one of the current Democratic frontrunners.
And that goes a long way to explain Bernie’s surge in the polls – and it also explains the support he’s receiving from Obama’s 2012 donors.
Nearly 35,000 of Obama’s contributors in 2012 have also contributed in the democratic primary this year.
And nearly 25,000 of them have contributed to Bernie’s campaign.
Because Americans are still ready for a political revolution.
It’s been more than 80 years since the Great Depression and World War II, and the generation that remembers the fevered free-market style of capitalism that led to the depression has mostly died off.
And today, we’re just barely out of the Great Recession of 2008.
But we never got the dramatic New Deal-style economic and social reforms that Americans voted for when we elected Barack Obama in 2008 in the midst of that recession.
We hoped that a vote for so-called “socialist” Obama was a vote for real change in our political and economic systems … and for a variety of reasons we didn’t get it.
And now the US is turning to a self-described socialist who regularly talks about his campaign as leading a political revolution and Hillary Clinton is trying hard to frame herself as a real populist.
The 2016 political season is starting to get very interesting.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.