Skip to content Skip to footer
|

We Need a New Marshall Plan for the Middle East

We need a new strategy to fight terrorism, because the one we’re using right now just isn’t working.

Today, President Obama sent to Congress the White House’s plan for authorizing the fight against ISIS.

The president’s proposal limits to three years the now-six-month-long campaign in Iraq and Syria, but it perpetuates the idea that war is the answer in the fight against terrorism.

And that’s a big mistake.

See more news and opinion from Thom Hartmann at Truthout here.

We need a new strategy to fight terrorism, because the one we’re using right now just isn’t working.

In fact, it’s only making things worse.

On The Guardian’s website right now, there’s an absolutely heartbreaking story about a 13-year-old Yemeni boy named Mohammed Saleh Tauiman.

Mohammed was killed by a US drone strike on January 26, but before he was killed, he worked with Guardian journalists to produce a video about how his family was coping with the death of their father, who was also killed by a drone strike.

That video exposes in a really graphic way the failure of the “war on terror.”

Not only are Mohammed’s siblings angry at the US for killing their father, but in the wake of his death they now also get financial support from al-Qaeda.

Now, there’s no proof that Mohammed or his family supported al-Qaeda, but what happened to them is a great example of what fuels terrorism and terrorist groups.

You see, President Obama was right when he said that ISIS and al-Qaeda are “death cults.”

They prey on death and suffering, and like all death cults from the Nazis to the Khmer Rouge, they’re really just nihilists who are interested in one thing: perpetuating their own power through violence.

This has nothing to with Islam, by the way. ISIS and al-Qaeda are about as Islamic as Hitler was Christian and Tojo, Japan’s military leader during World War II, was Shinto or Buddhist.

But back to the bigger point about death cults. The thing about death cults is that there’s only one real way to defeat them. And that’s by helping the people who believe in them stop believing in them.

This is what we did after World War II in Germany and Japan.

The people of Germany and the people of Japan were totally behind Hitler and Tojo because they bought into the death cult that both dictators presided over.

Hitler said he was bringing about a 1,000 year Reich and the Germans believed him. In Japan, meanwhile, they believed the emperor was literally a descendant of the sun god.

But after the war was over, we won the hearts and minds of the people and we convinced them that their death cult was wrong.

How did we do this? We showed them that our way of life was better than their death cult. We did this by injecting massive amounts economic aid into their societies and, at the same time, exposing the crimes of the old regime.

Can we do the same against the ISIS and al-Qaeda death cults? Absolutely – but there’s a catch.

Unlike the Nazi or Japanese death cults, ISIS and al-Qaeda are not states, they’re ideologies (although ISIS has constructed a pseudo-state of sorts in Iraq and Syria).

This means that war, although crucial for the defeat of the Nazis and the Japanese imperialists, will, in the long run, only fan the flames of the ISIS and al-Qaeda death cults.

After all, it’s pretty hard to convince people that their death cult is wrong when every day US drones are killing their fathers, brothers and sisters.

This should be obvious after 13 years of trying to bomb al-Qaeda into oblivion only to find out that one dead terrorist means 10 new ones.

When it comes down to it, the “war on terror” is not a military war, it’s an information war, and ISIS is getting really good at their end of the PR and propaganda.

So the only way we can permanently defeat the al-Qaeda and ISIS death cults is by showing the people who believe in those death cults that they’re wrong and by avoiding the kind of behavior that pushes people towards those death cults in the first place.

We need to dial back the military and ramp up the economic aid.

In other words, we need a new Marshall Plan for the Middle East – one that doesn’t involve more massive profits for US military contractors, but helps those countries rebuild their own infrastructure from the bottom up.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.