Skip to content Skip to footer
|

Corporations Screw Everybody

(Image: EN2008)

Corporate executives don’t give a damn about their workers, and it’s all because of Reagan.

A new analysis released by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) shows just how much of a “screw the workers” mentality today’s corporate executives have.

According to EPI, in 2013, the share of corporate income that ended up in the pockets of the men and women who make corporate executives so filthy rich hit its lowest point since 1950.

And, as Think Progress points out, corporate profits “have risen nearly 20 times faster than workers’ incomes since 2008, and on the whole workers have seen a lost decade of stagnant wage growth.”

So, corporations are taking in more and more money, their executives are getting bigger and bigger paychecks, but the workers responsible for all of that wealth are barely seeing a dime of it.

Why is that?

Reagan.

Before Reagan came to Washington, corporations knew they had a responsibility to a number of groups. They had a responsibility to their workers, to their community, to their customers, to the institution of the company itself and to the stockholders.

Believe it or not, they actually cared about their workers making decent wages, their customers buying reliable products and the impact of their behaviors on the community.

When people got laid off, it was considered a “failure of management.” Offshoring was unheard of.

But then things began to change.

Suddenly, thanks to Chicago School Boys like Milton Friedman, there was this idea floating around that CEOs and corporations only should do what was best for the shareholders.

Screw everyone else. Screw the community, screw the company, screw the customers, and, most of all, screw the workers.

Tragically, Ronald Reagan was a fan of that toxic thinking.

So, in the early 1980s, his administration changed tax laws and rules, to turn CEOs more into shareholders than employees.

All of a sudden, CEOs were getting huge chunks of their salaries not from regular payroll, but from stock options (with a lower tax rate), something that had been previously illegal.

Because of that, CEOs began to care more and more about what was best for the shareholders, while saying screw you to the workers, to the communities, to the institution of the company itself (if they could chop it up and sell or merge it, that’s just fine!) and to their customers.

Any loyalty to anyone or anything other than the stockholders was lost.

And that’s why today’s CEOs are raking in hundreds of millions dollars, while workers are seeing their lowest share of corporate income in more than six decades.

Just look at UnitedHealthcare’s CEO, Stephen J. Hemsley.

According to Forbes, in 2013, Hemsley had a base annual salary of $1.3 million.

BUT, thanks to Reagan, Hemsley also has over $700 million in unexercised stock options at a maximum 20 percent income tax rate.

That’s quite the nest egg, and it’s only getting bigger.

The US is one of only a very few countries in the developed world that rewards its CEOs with stock options.

That’s crazy.

This is bad policy for the United States, its workers and for the corporations themselves, and it’s time we change it.

Corporate executives today need to have more skin in the game. They need to be thinking about more than just the rises and falls in their stock.

We need to undo the damage done by Reagan, and make US CEOs answerable once again to their companies, their communities, their customers and their workers.

Only then will Americans overall begin to reap the rewards of corporate successes.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.