Part of the Series
Gaza on Fire
The greatest struggle facing the antiwar movement in the United States is the struggle to get people who come to antiwar demonstrations after a war starts to engage politically to prevent the same wars in the future. In the case of US policy toward Iran, we created a political movement to support diplomacy with Iran to prevent war in the future. But in the case of Gaza, there is no political movement in the United States to support diplomacy to prevent war in the future.
Consider:
1. While Israel was bombing and invading Gaza, there were demonstrations across the United States against the war and against US support for the war.
2. A key cause of the war was the blockade imposed on 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza by Israel and Egypt. Exports from Gaza are virtually banned. Gaza is not allowed to use its seaport. Palestinians in Gaza can’t travel normally to and from Gaza. They have to get permission from the Israeli or Egyptian governments that might never come, blocking their ability to work, study, receive medical care and see their families.
3. It is generally acknowledged by experts that if current diplomacy fails to end the blockade of Gaza, it is inevitable that there will be another outbreak of violence on the Israel-Gaza border in the future.
4. The question of the Gaza blockade is on the table right now in the talks that have been taking place between Israel and the Palestinians in Cairo. Press reports suggest that it could go either way: There might be an agreement that ends the blockade, or there might not.
5. Thus, there are two likely paths out of the current juncture: Either there will be an agreement in Cairo that ends the Gaza blockade, or there will be another war in the future, much like the one that people have been protesting; and which path happens is likely to be decisively shaped by what happens in the next few days of diplomacy in Cairo, a process on which the US government obviously has significant influence.
Why can’t we get the people who have protested the war to engage politically to prevent the same war from happening again in the future?
What would be worse than the killing of innocents that has happened so far? Doing nothing to stop the same killing of innocents in the future, when we had the ability to do something concrete.
Exactly two members of Congress – Keith Ellison and Barbara Lee – have publicly called for ending the blockade now through negotiations.
Tell me: If the antiwar left would engage on the issue of the Gaza blockade, we couldn’t get John Conyers to speak up for ending the blockade through diplomacy? We couldn’t get Hank Johnson to speak up? Charlie Rangel, John Lewis, Danny Davis, Bobby Rush, Donna Edwards, Karen Bass, Maxine Waters, Eleanor Norton? None of them would speak up, if the antiwar left would engage politically?
Danny Glover took a #StandWithKeith:
I #StandWithKeith: CPC co-chair Rep. @KeithEllison: End the Gaza blockade to achieve peace https://t.co/5iDqut2Ivp
— Danny Glover (@mrdannyglover) August 11, 2014
Why won’t the antiwar left #StandWithKeith?
You can take action here.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.