The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced Wednesday that it would write new net neutrality rules to prevent telecommunications companies from blocking, slowing or otherwise discriminating against web content.
Last month, a federal appeals court threw out the FCC’s 2010 net neutrality rules after a legal challenge from Verizon. The court said the FCC has some authority to protect consumers and regulate Internet service provides but declared the 2010 rules invalid because the agency had failed to classify the Internet as a “common carrier” service like telephones that could be regulated more like a public utility.
In a statement, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said the agency would not appeal the ruling and would consider its authority under existing law to write new net neutrality rules.
Open-Internet advocates fear that, without net neutrality rules, big telecom companies like Verizon would discriminate against competing content online and charge content providers premiums to reach consumers at faster speeds, which could put start-ups and minority voices at a disadvantage.
Net neutrality opponents, including many Republicans in Congress, argue that such rules would stifle innovation.
Wheeler, who recently joined the FCC and has until now made only vague public statements as to how he intends to address net neutrality, appears to share the concerns of open-Internet advocates. He said he recently discussed net neutrality with startup entrepreneurs in Los Angeles.
“Their companies may succeed or they may fail depending on whether they are truly creative and innovative,” Wheeler said in a statement. “But they and other innovators cannot be judged on their own merits if they are unfairly prevented from harnessing the full power of the Internet, which would harm the virtuous cycle of innovation that has benefitted consumers, edge providers, and broadband networks.”
The FCC is leaving its options open for harnessing the legal authority to set new rules that would withstand the inevitable court challenges from big telecom companies. Wheeler said the FCC would consider its authority under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to “encourage broadband deployment by, among other things, removing barriers to infrastructure deployment, encouraging innovation, and promoting competition.”
Open-Internet advocates, however, argue that the FCC must take the more definitive step of reclassifying the Internet as a “common carrier” service to issue net neutrality rules that can withstand legal challenges. Wheeler has been reluctant to reclassify despite support from Democrats in Congress, but he said the option is still on the table.
“Failing to reclassify would have severe consequences over the long term and prolong the uncertainty that has plagued the FCC over the past decade,” said Free Press President Craig Aaron, a staunch supporter of net neutrality and tougher regulation of the telecom industry. “The FCC has the power to reclassify. Nothing in today’s announcement forecloses this better path, but the FCC’s reluctance to take it is baffling and short-sighted.”
Wheeler’s effort is expected to draw opposition from the telecom industry, Republicans in Congress and even some of his fellow commissioners.
“The Internet was free and open before the FCC adopted net neutrality rules,” said FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, who is skeptical that Wheeler’s current effort will end up differently from the last. “It remains free and open today. Net neutrality has always been a solution in search of a problem.”
In response to a popular online petition, the White House recently issued a statement supporting the FCC’s effort to establish new net neutrality rules but suggested that President Obama would not direct the agency to do so by reclassifying the Internet as a common carrier.
The FCC is taking public comments on net neutrality. For information on submitting comments, click here.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 231 new monthly donors in the next 2 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy