Skip to content Skip to footer

The Environmental Health Costs of a Petrochemical Future

A chemical industry trade group is touting a job-creating side benefit of fracking in North Carolina, claiming that building a plant to process natural gas into the petrochemical products used to make plastics and synthetic fabrics would create thousands of jobs for the state.

Part of the Series

A chemical industry trade group is touting a job-creating side benefit of fracking in North Carolina, claiming that building a plant to process natural gas into the petrochemical products used to make plastics and synthetic fabrics would create thousands of jobs for the state.

But the experience of other places with similar facilities shows those jobs would come at a heavy cost to the health of the environment and local community.

The American Chemistry Council recently released a report claiming that 15,000 jobs would result from construction of a single ethylene production plant in North Carolina, where the legislature recently legalized fracking, which could begin as soon as 2014. The plants are known as “ethane crackers” because they break down or “crack” complex hydrocarbons from oil and gas into simpler molecules that can then be turned into everything from trash bags to footwear, tires to paint. Shell is currently considering building a cracker in Pennsylvania, a major fracking center, and is seeking big tax breaks for the project.

But even industry insiders questioned the report’s optimistic job claims. Vikram Rao, a member of North Carolina’s new Energy and Mining Commission and a former chief technology officer at fracking pioneer Halliburton, expressed his doubt to the News & Observer of Raleigh.

“I mean, come on,” he told the paper in disbelief.

While the number of jobs such a plant would create may be disputed, something that’s certain is that the facility would emit a lot of highly toxic pollution.

Consider the experience of Norco, La., a community about 24 miles west of New Orleans where Shell Oil — the Houston-based subsidiary of Royal Dutch Shell — operates a major ethane cracker (photo above). In 2010 alone, Shell’s Norco plant released over 480,000 pounds of toxic pollution to the air, including large quantities of chemicals known to cause cancer and birth defects, according to the Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxics Release Inventory of self-reported data. Those releases included:

  • more than 34,000 pounds of 1,3-butadiene, which is classified by the federal government as a chemical known to cause cancer;
  • more than 55,000 pounds of benzene, known to damage the blood and immune system and to cause blood cancer;
  • more than 6,000 pounds of ethylbenzene, classified as a possible human carcinogen and linked to kidney damage in exposed animals;
  • more than 45,000 pounds of naphthalene, which has been shown to cause tumors in mice and is considered a possible human carcinogen;
  • more than 2,300 pounds of styrene, a possible carcinogen;
  • more than 30,000 pounds of toluene, which can affect the nervous system and cause loss of strength, memory, hearing and color vision; and
  • more than 13,000 pounds of xylene, which can damage the lungs, liver and kidneys.

Shell’s Norco facility is blamed for serious health problems among residents of an African-American neighborhood that found itself right on the plant’s fenceline after an expansion. Facing South visited the community last year and reported on residents’ experience.

After two people died in a 1973 explosion triggered by someone starting a lawnmower above one of the plant’s leaking underground pipelines, Diamond residents formed a group called Concerned Citizens of Norco to demand relocation. In 2002, Shell finally agreed to buy out Diamond residents, who had grown so frightened by the plant’s frequent accidents that some of them slept fully clothed in case they had to flee in the night.

Iris Carter, an activist with Concerned Citizens and the Louisiana Bucket Brigade, an environmental health advocacy group, reported unusually high rates of cancer and the autoimmune disease scleroderma among people from the Diamond community, where she lived much of her life. Scleroderma has been linked to exposure to petrochemical solvents. Carter and her daughter were also diagnosed with environmentally-related asthma, while her sister suffered from a rare blood cancer.

“We didn’t know it was dangerous,” said Carter, who in the photo above is standing in front of Shell’s Norco cracker. “Sometimes what you don’t know can hurt you.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy