Skip to content Skip to footer

Yes, Blame the NRA for the Movie Theater Shooting in Colorado

Thanks to the NRA’s incessant lobbying and PR, many Americans believe it is their right to own not just guns like hunting rifles, but assault weapons.

The Brady Campaign has a 62-page list of mass shootings in America since 2005. It is Wayne LaPierre’s resume.

For 21 years, LaPierre has been the executive vice president – and chief political strategist – of the National Rifle Association (NRA). The blood of the victims of the Aurora, Colorado, shooting is on his hands.

Of course LaPierre didn’t pull the trigger, but he’s the NRA’s hit man when it comes to intimidating elected officials to oppose any kind of gun control, and he’s the nation’s most vocal advocate of gun owner rights.

The NRA not only lobbies on behalf of “stand your ground” laws, but also offers insurance to members to pay for the legal costs of shooting people in “self-defense.” The NRA also defends the right of Americans to carry concealed weapons, including handguns.

James Holmes, the man who allegedly walked into the Aurora movie theater, killed 12 people and wounded 58 others, was no doubt disturbed in some way. He’s not alone. There are lots of deeply troubled people around. But if we make it easy for them to obtain guns, they are more likely to translate their psychological problems into dangerous and deadly antisocial behavior. The three guns Holmes used in the killings were all purchased legally.

LaPierre’s job (which he’s held for 21 years) is to make it easier for people to buy and use guns. And so far, he’s been damn successful.

It is no accident that the United States ranks first in the world – by a wide margin – in gun-related civilian deaths and injuries. Compared with every other democracy, we have the most guns and the weakest gun laws. The shooting at the Aurora movie theater was not an isolated incident. We’ve almost become used to a regular diet of gun-toting rampages. The most visible of them – like the Columbine and Virginia Tech killings, and the Arizona shooting that nearly claimed the life of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and left six others dead – stick in our minds, but there are many others. And even more Americans are killed each year in one-on-one shootings.

The NRA has two knee-jerk responses to this. The first is that the Second Amendment gives all Americans the right to possess guns of all kinds – not just hunting rifles, but machine guns and semi-automatics. Efforts to restrict gun sales and ownership are thus, according to the NRA, an assault on our constitutional freedoms. The second is the cliché that “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” To the NRA, gun laws have nothing to do with the epidemic of gun-related killings. Both of these arguments are bogus, but the NRA has the money and membership (4 million) to translate these idiot ideas into political clout to thwart even reasonable gun control laws.

Even in countries with strong gun-control laws, some people will get their hands on a weapon and destroy others’ lives. The tragic killing in Norway one year ago is testament to this reality. (Although let’s recall that Anders Breivik bought $550 worth of 30-round ammunition clips from an American gun supplier for the rifle he used to kill 69 Norwegian kids at a summer camp. Thanks to American laws, it was a legal online purchase).

But the shooting in Norway was an infrequent occurrence. It is, in fact, one of the safest countries in the world. In contrast, the United States is off the charts in terms of murder rates. In other well-off democratic countries, gun violence is rare and shocking. In the United States, it is a frequent occurrence and almost taken for granted.

According to the most recent comparative figures, the United States had 5 murders for every 100,000 inhabitants. Finland was next with only 2.3 murders per 100,000 residents, followed by Canada (1.8), Belgium (1.7), France (1.3), England and Australia (both 1.2), Netherlands (1.1), Sweden (1.0), Germany (0.8), Norway (0.6) and Japan and Austria (both 0.5). In other words, America’s murder rate is more than eight times greater than Norway’s.

These statistics translate into real-life tragedies. In 2010, there were 12,996 murders in the United States and 8,775 (24 a day) were caused by firearms. Suicides and unintentional shootings account for another 20,000 deaths by guns each year. Of course, many more people are injured – some seriously, and permanently – by gun violence.

Many gun-related deaths are committed by people who purchase their weapons legally. Others purchase or steal them illegally, but their ability to get access to a gun is due to our lax laws on gun ownership.

The news media will spend an inordinate amount of effort trying to figure out what was in the gunman’s head before he put on his protective gear, carried three guns into the theater and began his assault on innocent victims. On Sunday, when Meet the Press host David Gregory asked Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper whether this Aurora incident should lead to a discussion of gun control, he avoided the question entirely and instead focused on Holmes’ state of mind, calling him “demonic,” “twisted” and “deeply, deeply disturbed.” Although the psychology of the murderer may be fascinating, it should not be the major focus. There are plenty of deranged people in the world, but in most well-off countries they can’t easily get their hands on a firearm.

The U.S. has more guns per capita than any other well-off democratic country. But the danger isn’t simply the number of guns; it is the type of guns we allow people to legally purchase. Other countries permit hunting rifles, but many Americans believe it is their right to own an assault weapon.

Here’s where the NRA comes in. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, since 1990, the gun lobby has contributed $27.7 million to candidates for Congress and the White House, 86 percent of it to Republicans.

In contrast, the gun control lobby has donated only $1.9 million to politicians, 94 percent to Democrats.

Of course, Democrats are not immune from the NRA’s influence. Seventeen House Democrats recently voted in favor of criminal contempt for Attorney General Eric Holder for his oversight of Operation Fast and Furious, the failed government operation that attempted to track the flow of guns into Mexico using paid straw buyers in the United States (the NRA previously said it considered Fast and Furious part of an “anti-gun agenda”). Not surprisingly, each of them received campaign contributions from the NRA in the last two election cycles. And each of them is on the hit list of vulnerable Democrats whose districts have a Republican or conservative majority of voters, and thus are targets of NRA efforts to unseat them.

The NRA’s LaPierre is at the top of the gun rights food-chain. It’s hard to know if he’s mentally unstable, but he’s certainly crazy like a fox (and FOX News). For example, he recently gave a well-received speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington in which he said that President Obama was part of a “conspiracy to ensure re-election by lulling gun owners to sleep.” LaPierre added: “All that first term, lip service to gun owners is just part of a massive Obama conspiracy to deceive voters and hide his true intentions to destroy the Second Amendment during his second term.” He also warned that what “gun owners across America have fought to achieve over the past three decades could be lost” if Obama wins a second term.

Every American grieves for the families and friends of the people killed and injured in the Aurora shooting. So far, LaPierre has been silent on the Aurora gun massacre. But until we tame the power of the NRA, we can expect more killings like this, as well as the deadly daily diet of murders throughout America committed by angry, and in some cases, mentally illy, gun-toting people whose “freedom” to own weapons of mass destruction LaPierre defends.

​​Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.

Truthout is widely read among people with lower ­incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.

We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so — especially now, because we only have the rest of today to raise $20,000 in critical funds.

We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?