For months, President Donald Trump has alleged without evidence that any expansion of mail-in voting in the 2020 election will lead to “tremendous” fraud and a “rigged” election. Last month, he suggested without evidence that vote by mail might even allow citizens to vote twice, urging North Carolina voters to try voting by mail and in person to test for alleged faults in the system.
But an analysis of voter data from the April primary in the swing state of Wisconsin shows that mail-in voting may pose the opposite risk — rejected ballots. Slightly more than 23,000 ballots were thrown out in the primary, according to an analysis by APM Reports, mostly because those voters or their witnesses missed at least one line on a form.
That figure is nearly equivalent to Trump’s 2016 margin of victory in Wisconsin of 22,748 votes. And with Wisconsin voter turnout expected to double from April to more than 3 million in November, a proportionate volume of ballot rejections could be the difference in who wins the swing state and possibly the presidency.
The analysis shows the difficulty some voters had casting a ballot through the mail, also commonly known as absentee voting. It also reveals how voters weighed the risk of voting in person during a pandemic with navigating the rules of absentee voting, often for the first time.
For an absentee ballot to count in Wisconsin, a voter and a witness must sign the ballot envelope and include the address of the witness. Those safeguards — put in place to eliminate mail-in ballot fraud — in fact contributed to the rejection of 13,834 ballots, according to the analysis.
Election experts are not surprised by Wisconsin’s ballot rejections. They say people in states like Wisconsin that do not have high by-mail voting rates are more prone to make errors.
“You’re asking folks to do something new,” said Michael McDonald, who studies voter data as a political science professor at the University of Florida. “And whenever you try to do something new in the midst of unprecedented demand, you’re going to have problems.”
Nationally, more than 300,000 absentee ballots were rejected in the 2016 presidential election, according to data from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. That number is likely to grow in November.
This year, election officials and public health experts in most states are encouraging by-mail voting to reduce the spread of the coronavirus. The anticipated surge will come in an election already expected to have heavy turnout nationwide.
As a result, “we could easily see a million or more ballots being rejected because of some deficiency of the ballot,” McDonald said.
Wisconsin is among 29 “no excuse” states, plus the District of Columbia, that allow residents to vote absentee for any reason. Another five states send ballots to all registered voters without requiring a request for one.
Wisconsin was one of the first states to hold an in-person primary as the nation shut down to prevent the spread of the virus. The state had low vote-by-mail participation rates before this year.
Taken together, the analysis serves as a case study of what may lie ahead for a presidential battleground state overwhelmed by applications and without the experience or systems to cope. Other battleground states such as Georgia and Pennsylvania saw increased by-mail voting in their primaries, as well as problems managing an increase in absentee ballots.
In the 2016 and 2018 Wisconsin general elections, by-mail absentee ballots made up no more than 6% of all ballots counted. In April, the portion jumped to more than 60%, the result of Gov. Tony Evers’ stay-at-home order because of the pandemic.
Wisconsin’s big increase of by-mail voting in April
SOURCE: April 7, 2020, Absentee Voting Report, Wisconsin Elections Commission
And while state officials stress the percentage of rejected ballots in the April primary is consistent with rejection rates in past elections, it’s little comfort to voters who learned that their ballots were rejected months after they thought their votes were counted.
More importantly, while the rate may be similar, raw numbers will make the difference when it comes to winning or losing an election.
Number of rejected absentee ballots rose substantially
The rate of rejected absentee ballots is consistent with other Wisconsin elections, around 2 percent. However, the number of rejected ballots reflects the overall increase in absentee voting and is large enough that it could impact the outcome of elections.
SOURCE: April 7, 2020, Absentee Voting Report, Wisconsin Elections Commission
APM Reports and Wisconsin Watch requested names of voters who had their ballots rejected in the April primary, the 2018 general election and the 2016 primary and general election.
In interviews, several voters expressed surprise that their ballots were not counted.
“You got the time to send me the thing,” said James Moses of Salem Lakes, who has never been notified despite having ballots rejected in more than one election. “Can’t you give me a reason why it was rejected?”
Moses, a self-described conservative, said he voted absentee in April because he had shoulder surgery and could not drive. APM Reports filed an open records request to view his April ballot envelope. It was rejected because his wife, who witnessed Moses fill out the ballot and the certificate envelope, did not list their address on the form. Wisconsin requires the voter and a witness to sign the ballot envelope. It also requires the witness to fill out an address.
Nine states require a witness signature to submit an absentee ballot. Another three states require at least two witnesses or a notary agent, according to the nonpartisan Brookings Institution. Voters like Moses risk having their ballot rejected in November over a technicality like a missing witness — and yet they may receive no notification of the error and may be given no opportunity to fix the problem.
Moses said the rejections, along with the fact that he was never informed that his votes did not count, made him more distrustful of voting by mail. He said he will vote in person, either through early voting or at the polls, in November. “I think I’m going to make a point of going and doing it in person this time, no matter what it takes,” he said.
Shannon Hahn, the clerk who ran the election in Salem Lakes, said she tried to contact voters who did not properly fill out the form. But she could only reach people who provided their phone numbers to the clerk’s office. “We acted like detectives trying to find and get a hold of these people,” Hahn said. “We would have much more rejections if it wasn’t for us contacting people.”
Hahn went above and beyond. Wisconsin, along with 35 other states, does not require election officials to contact voters if they find a problem with an absentee ballot. And Wisconsin is considered the most decentralized state for election administration, with 1,850 municipal election officials and 72 county election officials.
In April, Hahn and the hundreds of other election officials were managing a heavy volume of absentee ballot requests and ballot submissions due to the stay-at-home order.
In Wisconsin, there were political and legal fights over whether the election should be delayed due to the pandemic. The U.S. Postal Service failed to deliver hundreds of ballots in the mail. And competing legal rulings created uncertainty over which guidelines voters and clerks had to follow. For example, a lower court waived the witness signature requirement on absentee ballots, but the ruling was later reversed. The courts also shifted the deadlines for returning absentee ballots.
It was chaotic, election officials acknowledge. Today, election officials refer to the primary as the “COVID election,” Hahn said.
State election officials have taken steps to ensure a better process for the August primary and the November general election: They have changed the computer system to help municipal clerks process absentee ballot applications. They are putting barcodes on mailings to help voters and officials track their ballots, and they are hoping the courts make early decisions on which rules to follow.
“I certainly hope that we can get the rules down straight so everybody knows what they are, so they’re not changing very close to the deadline,” said Reid Magney, a spokesperson for the Wisconsin Elections Commission, which administers and enforces Wisconsin’s elections law.
Magney also said the commission mailed out absentee ballot applications in September to every registered voter to help local election officials. Even so, Wisconsin’s election system is run by municipal and county election officials, according to the commission, and some of them juggle election administration with other municipal duties.
Despite election experts saying they will be better prepared in November, Democratic attorneys are worried the rules could lead to certain groups of voters seeing their ballots rejected at higher rates than others.
For example, some states require a voter’s signature to match what is on file at the election office. That could lead to wrongful rejections, because younger voters may not yet have established a signature, and older voters may have physical problems that cause their signature to deteriorate.
Studies have shown that younger voters and voters of color tend to have their ballots rejected at a higher rate than older White voters because older voters tend to cast their ballots earlier. But McDonald, with the University of Florida, said he is not certain that will continue, especially if mail delivery slows in rural communities that traditionally back Republican candidates.
“These rejected absentee ballots tend to break toward the Democrats,” McDonald said. “I don’t think anyone knows how these ballots will break for November, because there’s so many different moving parts.”
Trump has repeatedly criticized by-mail voting, claiming that “mailed ballots are corrupt,” despite twice voting by mail himself.
Republicans are actively trying to prevent any expansion of by-mail voting in several critical swing states, including a challenge to the use of election drop boxes in Pennsylvania. Meanwhile, Democrats are working to ease vote-by-mail restrictions, arguing for an extension of the ballot deadline in several states and requiring clerks to notify voters if there are mistakes on the ballot.
Most ballots rejected because of missing signature, witness signature or witness address
NOTE: Ballots rejected for missing a deadline were mostly due to being postmarked after election day. Other reasons ballots were rejected include a damaged or resealed envelope or the voter including multiple ballots in the same certification envelope.
* This chart excludes rejected ballots due to procedural reasons that don’t result in an uncounted vote, such as an initial ballot being rejected after the voter returns a subsequent ballot sent to them by officials that includes all races. It also excludes the small number of ballots rejected because a voter died or was ineligible to vote. SOURCE: Absentee Data File, Wisconsin Elections Commission
A typically high voter participation rate, combined with small city staff in an area that is not used to voting by mail, are ingredients for a spike in ballot rejection.
Take the city of Cedarburg. It is small — population 11,500 — and sits 23 miles northwest of Milwaukee. It has been a Republican stronghold for the past eight years.
Residents take voting seriously — more than 80% of the voting-age population cast ballots in the past two presidential elections, according to state election statistics, more than 13 points higher than the state average. But nearly all those voters cast their ballots in person.
That changed with the governor’s stay-at-home order. More than 60% of Cedarburg voters cast absentee ballots in April, compared to 7% in 2018.
“We were just inundated,” said Tracie Sette, Cedarburg’s city clerk. “It was all we could do to just keep up with the requests.”
The increase also brought a surge in rejected by-mail ballots.
In April, Cedarburg had both a relatively high number of rejected ballots (209) and rate of rejected ballots (7%), according to the Wisconsin Elections Commission. Comparatively, just three ballots were rejected in the 2016 presidential primary and the 2016 and 2018 general elections.
And of the ballots rejected in April, all but two were due to a missing voter signature, a missing witness signature or a missing witness address, voter-level records of rejected ballots from the elections commission show. Some people in Cedarburg were left wondering why their ballots were rejected and why they were not notified about the problem.
Bob and Jan Capen requested and filled out their absentee ballots for the April primary because they said they were leery of voting in person. Bob Capen, who owns a garage construction business, was working from home to avoid exposure to the virus. Jan, a retired teacher, was also staying close to home.
The couple signed their names as witnesses to each other’s ballots and mailed them, the first time they had not voted in person. Neither of their votes counted.
Cedarburg election officials marked the Capens’ ballots as “certification insufficient,” the most common reason cited for the rejection of 23,196 absentee ballots in Wisconsin’s April 7 election.
Copies of the Capens’ ballot envelopes obtained through a public records request show they both missed the yellow-highlighted line that required their addresses as witnesses.
The couple signed their names as witnesses to each other’s ballots and mailed them, the first time they had not voted in person. Neither of their votes counted.
Cedarburg election officials marked the Capens’ ballots as “certification insufficient,” the most common reason cited for the rejection of 23,196 absentee ballots in Wisconsin’s April 7 election.
Copies of the Capens’ ballot envelopes obtained through a public records request show they both missed the yellow-highlighted line that required their addresses as witnesses.
“It’s my fault,” Bob Capen said. “But based on what I’ve learned so far, it’s not an easy process for a lot of people, so I can see how it could get all clustered up.”
Diane Coenen, president of the Wisconsin Municipal Clerks Association, says voters can be confused by the process, especially if they are voting absentee for the first time.
She said the ballot envelope displays a lot of information and requires attention to detail. And most people do not read it from top to bottom. “Because of that, they may miss something,” Coenen said. “And if they miss something, the ballot will be rejected.” Other Cedarburg ballots suffered the same fate as the Capens.
Rykki Casey is a health care worker who voted absentee because she takes care of elderly and hospice patients. “I didn’t want to spread (illness) to them,” she said. Casey was confused about why her vote did not count. Her husband witnessed her ballot, but a copy of the ballot envelope showed that he, too, missed the line for his address. “I feel very sad. I want my voice heard,” she said.
Sette, the city clerk, said she tried to contact voters to tell them about the problems with the ballot envelopes in April, but stopped when she and her two colleagues became overwhelmed with managing ballot requests, submitted ballots and voter questions.
Today, the goal is the same, despite what Sette calls a “learning curve.” She aims to contact voters once to tell them there is an issue with their ballot envelope in the upcoming November election.
“We’re getting probably about 15 to 20 ballots back every day now,” Sette said. “And every single day, there is a little stack that is missing some information.”
The Wisconsin Elections Commission prepared a public relations campaign to remind voters how to cast a mail-in ballot. The commission also created digital tools for the November election that may help voters track their ballots in the mail.
Local election officials have already mailed 1.1. million absentee ballots to voters, eclipsing the total number of ballots cast through in-person and by-mail voting in the last presidential election, according to the commission. Wisconsin voters have returned 350,000 by-mail ballots through this week.
“Our hope is that we will have enough time to be able to communicate with voters,” said Magney of the elections commission, “and for them to be able to communicate back and handle this process.”
This story was edited by Dave Mann and Chris Worthington of American Public Media and Esther Kaplan of Reveal.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
After the election, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy