On Tuesday, members of the LGBTQ+ Caucus in the Wisconsin state legislature announced two resolutions aimed at keeping marriage equality intact in the state, including one that would remove a state constitutional amendment barring same-sex marriage that is still technically on the books.
The constitutional amendment — which is currently unenforceable due to the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court ruling in 2015 — was passed into law in 2006, after voters approved of a proposal that banned same-sex marriage and similar (but not equal) legal recognitions like civil unions.
Like the rest of the U.S., however, residents of the state soon changed their views on marriage equality, with a poll from 2022 demonstrating that nearly three-quarters of voters (72 percent) now favor it, with only 19 percent opposed to the idea.
The amendment was deemed unconstitutional in the Obergefell decision. However, that ruling did not do away with the state amendments and legislation that still remain unenforceable law throughout the country.
In response to fears over the possibility that a deeply conservative Supreme Court could overturn Obergefell (with at least one justice, Clarence Thomas, openly advocating for a reexamination of the ruling), Congress passed the Respect for Marriage Act last year, which President Joe Biden signed into law. The statute keeps in place some federal protections for same-sex marriages — however, it doesn’t codify marriage equality across the country, meaning states with anti-marriage equality laws still in place (35 in total) would revert to them if Obergefell was overruled in the future.
The Wisconsin legislative LGBTQ+ Caucus announced this week, on the anniversary of the Respect for Marriage Act, that it would introduce two measures to ensure that the state wouldn’t revert to previous discriminatory practices if that happened.
“It is long past time for our state constitution and our state statutes to reflect that marriage equality is the law of the land,” a statement from the caucus said.
The caucus put forth two proposals. The first would undo the constitutional amendment still on the books in Wisconsin, requiring passage of a resolution in two consecutive sessions of the state legislature plus a vote in support of the measure by voters in the state. The second piece of legislation would update statutory language on Wisconsin marriage laws to reflect marriage equality standards.
The possibility of either of the two proposals passing — despite clear support from residents in the state — is doubtful, given that both houses of the state legislature have a Republican majority due to extreme partisan gerrymandering. Still, LGBTQ+ Caucus member state Sen. Mark Spreitzer (D) expressed optimism that enough Republicans would come to their senses on the issue.
“We have had some Republican support for implementing marriage equality in the past, obviously it has not become law in past sessions, but we will continue to work with our Republican colleagues. We know that this is becoming an issue that can be bipartisan,” Spreitzer said.
Lucy Ripp, communications director for the progressive organization A Better Wisconsin Together, commended lawmakers for introducing the proposals.
“The freedom to marry who we love is a basic freedom that should not be denied to anyone. As we commemorate the anniversary of the Respect for Marriage Act, we are thrilled to see lawmakers at the state level taking proactive measures to strengthen and protect the rights of LGBTQ+ Wisconsinites,” Ripp said.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.