Raise your hand if you’ve ever heard of LuxLeaks. Anyone? LuxLeaks, also known as the Luxembourg Leaks, is one of the most interesting cases of international tax evasion of our time, and yet very few news outlets are talking about it.
Here are the basics: hundreds of companies were caught using tax avoidance schemes in the country of Luxembourg. It was exposed by a group called the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) and now those who exposed this massive tax issue are under threat.
The Major Players in LuxLeaks
Those involved in the LuxLeaks scandal include the country of Luxembourg, the Prime Minister at the time Jean-Claude Junker (by the way now President of the European Union), a group of investigative journalists and employees from PricewaterhouseCooper (PwC) who leaked the documents in the first place. PwC is the fifth largest corporation in the U.S., and operates in a number of countries. Their Luxembourg office was home to these tax-avoidance schemes.
This handy illustration shows how dual or ‘hybrid loan’ schemes were used to avoid paying taxes:
Anyone is welcome to scour the documents themselves at the ICIJ website.
So just who were some of these companies? Pepsi, IKEA, The Walt Disney Co., Deloitte, Earnest & Young, Koch Industries, AIG, Deutsche Bank and parts of the Canadian Government, to name a few.
Junker says he had no knowledge of the evasive tax practices, telling the press, “tax administration in Luxembourg acts autonomously, but I am politically responsible for these deals.” He also noted that everything that was done was, in fact, legal. And he is right there. These schemes were technically legal within the framework of the time. However, it turns out what the journalists did was considered less than legal.
The Paradox
This week, a journalist was charged in Luxembourg with facilitating the LuxLeaks scandal. Edouard Perrin, who has worked for a number of French news organizations, was criminally charged as the “co author” if not “accomplice” in exposing these tax documents.
ICIJ director Gerard Ryle put out a press statement regarding Perrin, stating:
The Luxembourg Leaks investigation, which Perrin played a key role in, revealed aggressive tax avoidance strategies that damaged national treasuries and hurt taxpayers at a time of austerity throughout the European Union. For a founding member of the EU to bring charges against a journalist in relation to reporting that is clearly in the public interest shows a lack of respect for the important role journalism plays in holding the powerful accountable.
Currently, besides Perrin, two employees of PwC were identified as being involved in the scandal. Although one wished to remain anonymous, a man named Antoine Deltour has spoken out, saying that he chose to leak documents due to a personal conviction. Deltour could face five years in jail if convicted.
Many within the journalistic and human rights communities believe that if whistleblowers and journalists are put in jail, while companies remain almost consequence free for their actions, it sets an incredibly dangerous precedence for the future of ethical business practices.
Is Anything Being Done?
The Members of the European Parliament have voted to convene a special committee on “unfair tax practices in the EU.” Originally a number of civil society groups asked the EU Parliament to set up a committee of ‘inquiry,’ which would have had the power to go after and expose unfair tax practices. This special committee is considered “weaker” and will begin by analyzing tax practices in all countries.
However, this still could lead to a number of revelations. The committee has six months to complete their first stage of review before moving on.
It is a positive step that from the LuxLeaks scandal there has been European government concern as well as international outrage over companies paying next to nothing in tax evasion schemes. However, trying journalists and whistleblowers for exposing unethical business models shows we still have a long way to go on just who is being held accountable when a scandal is revealed.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.