Skip to content Skip to footer

Watchdog: Thomas Accepted More in Gifts Than All Other SCOTUS Members Combined

Since 2004, Clarence Thomas has accepted more than $4 million in donations, much of it undisclosed.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas speaks during the Florida Chapters Conference of The Federalist Society at Disney's Yacht and Beach Club Resort in Lake Buena Vista, Florida, on January 31, 2020.

Chatting with a Republican lawmaker after attending a conservative conference at a five-star resort, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was far from relaxed and rejuvenated.

“One or more justices will leave soon,” he warned the member of Congress, according to a June 2000 memo drafted for then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist in June 2000, as previously reported by ProPublica. Thomas’ gripe: His salary of just under $174,000, or more than $306,000 in today’s dollars, was not enough, and justices like him – at the time composing a narrow 5-4 conservative majority – might just quit “unless the compensation for Supreme Court justices is increased,” according to the memo’s draft, a staffer with the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

Today Thomas’ salary, adjusting for inflation, has the same buying power as it did 24 years ago. But Thomas has nonetheless been able to level up, doubling his taxpayer-provided income while enjoying time on yachts and private jets provided by wealthy benefactors, including GOP mega-donor Harlan Crow.

Since 2004, Thomas has accepted more than $4 million in donations, much of it undisclosed and only revealed thanks to dogged reporting by ProPublica and others. That is more than every other justice who has served on the court over those same years – combined. As MSNBC economic analyst Steve Rattner commented: “One of these justices is not like the others.”

According to data compiled by Fix the Courts, a nonprofit that advocates stricter ethical rules for the nation’s highest judicial body, the justice who accepted the second most gifts, the deceased Antonin Scalia, came it at just over $210,000; Samuel Alito, coming in third, took $170,000.

“Public servants who make four times the median local salary, and who can make millions writing books on any topic they like, can afford to pay for their own vacations, vehicles, hunting excursions and club memberships — to say nothing of the influence the gift-givers are buying with their ‘generosity,’” Fix the Court founder Gabe Roth said in a statement. “The ethics crisis at the Court won’t begin to abate until justices adopt stricter gift acceptance rules.”

Post by @indivisiblechicago

View on Threads

Melissa Murray, a legal expert at New York University School of Law, told MSNBC that Thomas’ gift haul was impressive, if problematic.

“We have seen this sort of trickle out piecemeal, but having it displayed out in the aggregate really does make clear the expanse of the grift – I think that’s the right term for it, it is a grift,” Murray said Thursday. “He’s managed to amass two distinct income streams,” she noted (Thomas’ $4 million in gifts compares to $4.6 million in salary over the same years), the second one coming after he complained about the first. “Suddenly you see the money start rolling in.”

The gifts are not the only ethical issue with Thomas, who was accused of sexual harassment some 30 years ago by a former assistant, Anita Hill. His wife, Ginni Thomas, is a prominent right-wing activist who spent the winter of 2020 trying to overturn a democratic election on behalf of Donald Trump, whose campaign legal team referred to Thomas as their “only chance” to block President Joe Biden’s victory before January 6, 2021.

Instead of recusing himself, Thomas would go on to chide his colleagues, in a February 2021 decision, for not taking up a case brought by Trump and his allies challenging Pennsylvania’s election rules, writing in his dissent that, among other things, “fraud is more prevalent with mail-in ballots.”

Eric Segall, a constitutional law expert at George State University, claimed vindication Thursday, saying the revelations about Thomas’ finances only bolster his argument that the justice has a major ethics problem.

“He is what he was in 1991, corrupt,” Segall wrote on social media. “He is a bad man and a bad judge.”

A critical message, before you scroll away

You may not know that Truthout’s journalism is funded overwhelmingly by individual supporters. Readers just like you ensure that unique stories like the one above make it to print – all from an uncompromised, independent perspective.

At this very moment, we’re conducting a fundraiser with a goal to raise $13,000. So, if you’ve found value in what you read today, please consider a tax-deductible donation in any size to ensure this work continues. We thank you kindly for your support.