Democratic lawmakers in the Washington state legislature are pushing for the passage of a slew of bills that aim to protect abortion rights, both for state residents and for those traveling from jurisdictions where the procedure has been severely restricted.
The state of Washington is bordered by Oregon — where abortion rights remain intact — and Idaho, which has placed vast restrictions on abortion since the Supreme Court’s overturn of decades-old federal abortion protections last year.
Abortion is banned in Idaho except in cases where a pregnant person’s life is at risk, or in cases of rape or incest (though only if a police report has been filed). Because of Idaho’s proximity to Washington, it’s likely that residents will cross state lines to obtain the procedure — however, reproductive rights activists have raised concern that states with abortion bans may seek to penalize residents who travel out of state to get an abortion.
In response, lawmakers like Rep. Drew Hansen (D) have introduced bills to limit data that law enforcement agencies in other states can obtain from Washington.
A bill crafted by Hansen, which passed in the state House of Representatives last week, would protect the personal data of travelers to Washington state by blocking out-of-state subpoenas from jurisdictions seeking information on a person obtaining an abortion. The bill would also forbid law enforcement in Washington from cooperating with out-of-state investigations into people suspected of trying to get an abortion.
The bill would similarly protect the data of people who have traveled to Washington seeking gender-affirming care due to restrictions on such care in their state.
Lawmakers in the state legislature have proposed several additional abortion bills. One bill would ban health apps (including those that track menstruation cycles) from sharing the data of Washington residents or out-of-state travelers with law enforcement agencies unless they obtain the user’s consent to do so. Another bill would block discipline from other jurisdictions against Washington state doctors who perform an abortion for someone from a state where the procedure is illegal.
“If states like Texas are going to be creative and aggressive in restricting abortion, we in Washington state will be creative and aggressive in fighting back,” Hansen said in a statement on his data protection bill last week.
Should Hansen’s and other abortion rights bills make it to Gov. Jay Inslee’s (D) desk, it’s likely they will be signed into law. Inslee has repeatedly voiced his support for abortion rights and was among 20 governors in the U.S. last month to join a Reproductive Freedom Alliance. The initiative allows a network of governors and their staff across the country to share the best available strategies to combat anti-abortion measures and to expand abortion access —both for residents of their states and for people who live in states where the procedure is severely restricted.
In a press release on the alliance last month, Inslee said that abortion rights are “an issue of freedom.”
“Patients must have the freedom to make personal reproductive care decisions for themselves, without interference by activist politicians,” Inslee said. “Washington is taking strong action to protect these freedoms for every patient and provider in our state, and we are all in on the fight to protect a person’s right to an abortion across the country.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.