In response to far right lawmakers introducing a slew of anti-trans legislation over the past few months, a handful of states have moved to pass shield laws to protect medical providers and trans residents, as well as out-of-state visitors seeking gender-affirming care.
On April 10, Washington became the sixth state to pass a law protecting access to reproductive and gender-affirming health care within its borders, joining Massachusetts, California, the District of Columbia, Illinois, New Mexico, and Colorado. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) also responded to the onslaught of anti-trans attacks, signing executive orders declaring their states safe havens for refugees seeking gender-affirming care.
“The purpose of this bill is to ensure that those seeking care or those providing care for reproductive and gender-affirming care under the laws of our state are shielded from liability,” said Sen. Yasmin Trudeau (D). “Washington voters and this Legislature have been very clear on this issue — we support the right to that access, we also support anyone who comes into this state to receive that access.”
While Washington’s shield legislation has not yet been signed into law, Gov. Jay Inslee’s (D) is expected to sign the bill shortly. Inslee has supported trans-friendly legislation in the past and recently signed a measure that provides additional privacy to transgender people who pursue legal name changes, allowing trans people to request that their court records be sealed.
“Every single person should have the freedom to feel safe as their true authentic self…we see you and encourage you to come as you are,” Inslee told trans residents in a statement released on Trans Day of Visibility this month.
The Washington bill includes protection from civil proceedings and private rights of action, such as Texas’s abortion bounty hunter law, as well as protection of medical records and protection from wiretaps and disclosure of electronic records. It also ensures that people from out of state cannot be criminalized for seeking gender-affirming care or abortion services in Washington, and mandates that out-of-state requests for extradition and subpoenas for protected information be denied.
Trans advocates say that shield laws are especially critical as far right legislatures across the country pass bills barring access to gender-affirming care. According to the Movement Advancement Project, 14 states have banned best practice medication and surgical care for transgender youth, and the Human Rights Campaign has warned that half of trans youth have either already lost or are at risk of losing access to gender-affirming care in their state.
Missouri’s Attorney General Andrew Bailey (R), for example, just unilaterally restricted access to gender-affirming care for both youth and adults through an executive action so severe that the regulations will, in practice, amount to a full ban. While Lambda Legal and the ACLU of Missouri have vowed to sue to block the ban, the emergency rule may go into effect as soon as April 27.
“This is what elimination of transgender people looks like,” transgender activist and researcher Erin Reed wrote on Twitter in response to the ban.
Dozens of trans people in Missouri are terrified about what Bailey’s executive order could mean for their future, Reed said — and for some, the emergency rule could essentially be a death sentence.
Though traveling out of state for care may not be an option for everyone, shield laws will allow many transgender and nonbinary Missourians to seek gender-affirming health care in neighboring safe haven states, like Illinois. In some cases, Illinois practitioners may save their lives.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.