Skip to content Skip to footer

Warren and Sanders Refuse to Cozy Up to Wall Street Donors

Many 2020 Democratic presidential hopefuls have been raking in checks at big-dollar events across the U.S.

Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders speak in Boston for an Our Revolution rally on Friday, March 31, 2017.

While characterizing their campaigns as “grassroots” operations fueled by the people, many 2020 Democratic presidential hopefuls have reportedly been spending a significant chunk of their time on the trail cozying up to Wall Street executives and raking in checks at big-dollar events across the nation.

Two major presidential candidates, however, are eschewing the lavish fundraisers and donor meetings that have come to encapsulate the widespread corruption of the American political system: Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

“In the past, there was no candidate who didn’t come to New York, Chicago, L.A. for money,” Marc Lasry, the head of Avenue Capital Group and a major bundler for Hillary Clinton in 2016, told Bloomberg.

“Today,” said Lasry, “there are two candidates who aren’t doing that — Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders.”

Bloomberg reported Tuesday that while many major Democratic candidates are “trying to outdo each other with promises to finance their campaigns with grassroots contributions,” Wall Street executives say they have seen little change in candidates’ eagerness to ask them for cash.

According to Bloomberg:

In February, Pete Buttigieg stepped into the Manhattan office of Wall Street veteran Charles Myers to talk politics over deli sandwiches. Citigroup Inc. Managing Director Yann Coatanlem hosted a fundraiser in March for Kamala Harris at his Fifth Avenue apartment, where she shook the paw of the banker’s labradoodle. Three days later, former Goldman Sachs Group Inc. partner Bruce Heyman raised more than $100,000 for Amy Klobuchar at his home in Chicago. He’s planning an event for Joe Biden this fall.

Biden — currently the 2020 frontrunner according to most polls — was the focus of a New York Times story Tuesday that detailed how the former vice president “has constructed much of his early schedule around vacuuming up as much campaign cash as possible, as his operation presses to assert his frontrunner status with a show of financial force.”

John Morgan, a trial lawyer and major Florida political donor who hosted a big-dollar fundraiser for Biden on Tuesday, told the Times that the former vice president will “get my money when he comes to my house.”

“He’ll get my children’s money. And all my friends’ money,” Morgan added. “All in one night.”

Following the Times report, Biden’s campaign on Wednesday touted the “overwhelming grassroots support” it has seen since launching last month, claiming that 97 percent of its donations have come in amounts of less than $200.

But, as Bloomberg noted, that number omits “a key detail: how much that added up to.”

“With the spotlight on grassroots donors as Democrats emphasize their ability to raise money from sources other than big donors and corporate political action committees, candidates can camouflage large checks from wealthy contributors by citing the larger number of small-dollar donors, but not the actual dollar amounts,” Bloomberg reported.

“Since announcing his candidacy, Biden has held fundraisers hosted by big Democratic bundlers, including former Google Chairman Eric Schmidt, movie mogul Jeffrey Katzenberg, and Comcast Corp. executive David Cohen,” according to Bloomberg. “Admission to such closed-door events is $2,800, the maximum amount an individual is permitted to donate to a federal campaign.”

Labor leader and organizer RoseAnn DeMoro, a high-profile and vocal supporter of Sanders, warned that if the grassroots networks don’t get busy, the influx of Wall Street cash — which is “literally” buying candidates, she said — could be devastating for progressive hopes.

Sanders himself made a similar point in a recent email to supporters, calling out Biden’s big-money events — without mentioning the former vice president by name — and encouraging the grassroots to rise up in response.

“One of our opponents held JUST TWO fundraising events and walked away with $1.4 MILLION,” read Sanders’s email. “That’s easy money. But it’s also corrupting money.”

Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn

Dear Truthout Community,

If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.

We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.

Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.

There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.

Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?

It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.

We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.

We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.

Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment.

We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.

With love, rage, and solidarity,

Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy