A resurfaced video from two years ago shows former President Donald Trump endorsing the plan that would become known as Project 2025, an ultra-conservative roadmap for the next Republican president to drastically reshape the government — contradicting Trump’s recent claims that he has nothing to do with the initiative.
On Thursday, MSNBC aired the clip, which shows Trump speaking at an event held by the Heritage Foundation, the organization that developed Project 2025, in April 2022. Among other items, Project 2025 includes calls to “maintain a biblically based” abortion policy, roll back LGBTQ rights, upend the civil service program, and establish a Christian nationalist government in the U.S.
The video shows Trump claiming that the Heritage Foundation was going to “lay the groundwork” for the future of the conservative movement.
Heritage is “a great group,” Trump goes on, stating that they will create “detailed plans for exactly what our movement will do” if he and Republicans win control of the federal government in this fall’s elections.
At the 2022 event, Trump was introduced to the stage by Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation. Roberts recently said on a right-wing media channel that “we are in the process of the second American Revolution,” adding that things “will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”
“They’re going to work on some other things that are going to be very exciting, I think, Kevin, I think maybe the most exciting of all,” Trump said in the 2022 video, describing his anticipation for the then-unnamed Project 2025.
Although he was adamant in his support for the project in 2022, Trump attempted to disavow Project 2025 earlier this month, claiming he wasn’t affiliated with it in any way.
“I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it,” Trump wrote in a social media post.
The newly-released video seems to contradict that statement. But there have been other indications that Trump’s claims are disingenuous, including the fact that dozens of former Trump officials took part in authoring Project 2025, and that Heritage is a key sponsor of the Republican National Convention, where Trump is set to be officially nominated as the GOP candidate next week in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Trump appears to be distancing himself from Heritage and Project 2025 in a manner strategically similar to his attempts to soften how voters perceive his views on abortion. In recent weeks, Trump has tried to portray himself as supporting a “states’ rights” stance on the procedure. In reality, however, Trump has openly celebrated the fact that his three appointments to the Supreme Court helped upend federal abortion abortion protections — and earlier this year, Trump expressed support for a nationwide abortion ban.
Polling demonstrates that although the American public is largely unfamiliar with Project 2025, the plan is deeply unpopular when people learn about its proposals.
According to an Accountable.US/Upswing poll on Project 2025 conducted in May, only 12 percent of Americans knew a “great deal” or “a lot” about the right-wing set of proposals. After a “straight reading” of what Project 2025 is — describing the plan, without details, as being a “collection of policy proposals that will reshape the executive branch of American government in the next conservative presidency” — favorability for Project 2025 went up.
But support dropped when specifics were discussed, the poll found.
For example, 87 percent opposed cutting Social Security benefits for younger workers, and 86 percent said they opposed eliminating the Head Start program. Seventy-seven percent disapproved of passages that aim to legalize discrimination against LGBTQ people, 68 percent opposed criminalizing abortion medication, and 82 percent were against allowing Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to increase abortion surveillance. Seventy-nine percent also opposed the plan to allow presidents to fire employees in the civil service program based on their loyalties to them.
After those policies and more were thoroughly explained, 66 percent of respondents in the poll said they had a negative view of Project 2025, while only 25 percent said they approved.
That poll’s findings appear to have been confirmed by another survey. A Navigator Research poll in June similarly found that 7 in 10 respondents didn’t know enough about Project 2025 to formulate an opinion. When presented with 19 specific policies within the proposal, however, their views drastically changed, with 63 percent saying they opposed Project 2025 and only 24 percent approving.
Truthout Is Preparing to Meet Trump’s Agenda With Resistance at Every Turn
Dear Truthout Community,
If you feel rage, despondency, confusion and deep fear today, you are not alone. We’re feeling it too. We are heartsick. Facing down Trump’s fascist agenda, we are desperately worried about the most vulnerable people among us, including our loved ones and everyone in the Truthout community, and our minds are racing a million miles a minute to try to map out all that needs to be done.
We must give ourselves space to grieve and feel our fear, feel our rage, and keep in the forefront of our mind the stark truth that millions of real human lives are on the line. And simultaneously, we’ve got to get to work, take stock of our resources, and prepare to throw ourselves full force into the movement.
Journalism is a linchpin of that movement. Even as we are reeling, we’re summoning up all the energy we can to face down what’s coming, because we know that one of the sharpest weapons against fascism is publishing the truth.
There are many terrifying planks to the Trump agenda, and we plan to devote ourselves to reporting thoroughly on each one and, crucially, covering the movements resisting them. We also recognize that Trump is a dire threat to journalism itself, and that we must take this seriously from the outset.
Last week, the four of us sat down to have some hard but necessary conversations about Truthout under a Trump presidency. How would we defend our publication from an avalanche of far right lawsuits that seek to bankrupt us? How would we keep our reporters safe if they need to cover outbreaks of political violence, or if they are targeted by authorities? How will we urgently produce the practical analysis, tools and movement coverage that you need right now — breaking through our normal routines to meet a terrifying moment in ways that best serve you?
It will be a tough, scary four years to produce social justice-driven journalism. We need to deliver news, strategy, liberatory ideas, tools and movement-sparking solutions with a force that we never have had to before. And at the same time, we desperately need to protect our ability to do so.
We know this is such a painful moment and donations may understandably be the last thing on your mind. But we must ask for your support, which is needed in a new and urgent way.
We promise we will kick into an even higher gear to give you truthful news that cuts against the disinformation and vitriol and hate and violence. We promise to publish analyses that will serve the needs of the movements we all rely on to survive the next four years, and even build for the future. We promise to be responsive, to recognize you as members of our community with a vital stake and voice in this work.
Please dig deep if you can, but a donation of any amount will be a truly meaningful and tangible action in this cataclysmic historical moment. We are presently looking for 253 new monthly donors in the next 3 days.
We’re with you. Let’s do all we can to move forward together.
With love, rage, and solidarity,
Maya, Negin, Saima, and Ziggy