A coalition of grassroots groups from across the political spectrum joined forces to fly an airship over the NSA’s data center in Bluffdale, Utah on Friday, June 27, 2014, to protest the government’s illegal mass surveillance program. The environmental group Greenpeace flew its 135′ long thermal airship over the data center carrying the message “NSA Illegal Spying Below”. (Photo: EFF Photos / Greenpeace)
The failure of Congress to pass any meaningful reform of National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance powers has many activists looking for another approach to stop the massive spy agency. But if a state representative in Utah has his way, that approach will be to turn off the agency’s water, and his state will be ground zero.
Less than 24 hours after reports broke that the USA Freedom Act failed to move forward in the Senate, a powerful interim committee for public utilities in the Utah state legislature held a hearing on a bill there that would start the process of turning off water and other state assistance to the recently-opened NSA data center in Bluffdale.
Introduced by Rep. Marc Roberts (R- Santaquin) late in the 2014 legislative session, the 4th Amendment Protection Act is a response to what many see as a violation of not just privacy rights by the NSA, but of public trust as well.
“The data center here was welcomed by the state of Utah with a promise that their activities would remain within Constitutional bounds,” said Roberts. “I think we all know and are aware that has been violated,” he continued.
The hearing was an opportunity for the bill to receive public input before it is formally reintroduced for the 2015 legislative session. One inside source said that committee members received “tons of emails” from the public in favor of the bill.
According to statements made at the hearing, when operating at full capacity, the NSA data center will require 1.7 million gallons of water to function each day, primarily to keep the servers from overheating and shutting down.
One committee member suggested that the NSA would simply reuse the water over and over in a closed loop, but a local data-center expert refuted this claim.
“A lot of the water that is consumed is evaporated into the atmosphere and is not sent back into the system,” said Pete Ashdown, the founder and CEO of Utah’s first independent and oldest internet service provider, XMission.
“What this tells us, first and foremost, is that this NSA facility cannot operate without Utah’s help,” said Mike Maharrey, executive director of the OffNow Project whose model legislation the Utah bill is based on. “And as Nevada showed us by turning off water to the Department of Energy (DOE), this strategy actually works,” he continued.
Over a number of years, Nevada denied the DOE’s five applications for the use of water to construct and operate the proposed high-level nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain. By doing so, they held the construction process up in court long enough that the project became unsustainable.
And in a 2007 ruling, a US district court in Las Vegas sided with the state. “The validity of Western states’ groundwater rights and the right to regulate water in the public interest is not a right to be taken lightly, nor is it a right that can cavalierly be ignored or violated by a federal agency,” wrote Judge Roger L. Hunt.
A Salt Lake Tribune report late last year noted that the NSA was getting a sweetheart deal on water. “Bluffdale agreed to sell water to the National Security Agency at a rate below its own guidelines and the Utah average in order to secure the contract and spur economic development in the town,” wrote Nate Carlisle of the Tribune.
But determining just how much water the facility is using has been “difficult” according to Roberts. “I’ve tried to get that information from Bluffdale, but they won’t disclose it,” he said. Roberts also noted that at full capacity, usage would be equivalent to that used by more than 21,000 people, which in a state where water shortages and restrictions are common, was concerning to some.
“I’m concerned about not subsidizing the costs of this on the backs of Utah citizens,” said one committee member.
“For 40 years we’ve waited on Congress to get the job done, and they failed once again,” Maharrey continued, referring to Sen. Frank Church’s 1975 warning about NSA powers. “We’re done waiting for Congress to stop the NSA, and with bills like this, we’ll stop the NSA whether Congress wants to or not.”
Ashdown agreed. “I opposed the effort to turn off the water to the NSA data center last year because I was hoping the federal Congress would take action,” he said. “They have tried three times to take action and failed three times. So I really do think it is a state issue at this point to show that we do not support these infringements on our rights.”
According to Maharrey, a strong grassroots showing in the states is the path forward. “The only way we’re going to win is if people get on the phone in all 50 states, urging their state representatives to introduce and support the 4th Amendment Protection Act.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.