In an interview with Fox News (12/7/2010) Senator Joseph Lieberman stated that not only did WikiLeaks violate U.S. law under the Espionage Act, but the New York Times itself was on shaky legal ground for republishing some of the cables. Lieberman went on to say,
“To me, The New York Times has committed at least an act of bad citizenship, but whether they have committed a crime, I think that bears very intensive inquiry by the Justice Department.”
One is left to wonder. Does Senator Lieberman mean that the law should seek to punish some sort of unspecified “bad citizenship”? Or does he mean that “bad citizenship” (whatever that might be exactly) should be subject to equally vague sanctions or pretextual prosecutions under other statutes?
In either case, the Senator’s remark bespeaks an official mindset that is hostile to any exercise of free speech that might inconvenience or have an actual impact on the impunity of government.
Given the hysterical reactions of elected, appointed and self-appointed public persons, it will perhaps serve to call attention to Section 13 of the Reich Editorial Law (4 October 1933) which provided as follows:
“Editors are especially bound to keep out of the newspapers anything which:
“1. in any manner is misleading to the public, mixes selfish aims with community aims
“2. tends to weaken the strength of the German Reich, outwardly or inwardly, the common will of the German people, the German defense ability, culture or economy, or offends the religious sentiments of others,
“3. offends the honor and dignity of Germany,
“4. illegally offends the honor or the welfare of another, hurts his reputation, makes him ridiculous or contemptible,
“5. is immoral for other reasons.”
(1933 REICHSGESETZBLATT, PART I, PAGE 713)
(https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/2083-ps.asp)
Americans need to take remarks such as Lieberman’s very seriously and consider them a wake-up call to what is taking place in the name of security and protecting at risk “assets” as Attorney General Holder put it in his recent news conference (11/29/2010).
The imposition of sanctions, whether formal or informal, against the dissemination of “harmful” information is the cornerstone on which State control of expression and opinion is erected.
©WCG, 2010
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.