US officials are “probing a possible attempted coverup” in the deaths of five Afghan civilians in February in a raid carried out by US Special Forces accompanied by Afghan troops, the Los Angeles Times reports. Among the charges is that the bodies were tampered with by US forces to conceal the cause of death.
But even as the US is supposedly investigating, US officials say allegations that bullets were dug out of the bodies as part of a coverup are baseless, The Los Angeles Times says.
Jerome Starkey had reported in the Times of London that Afghan investigators said US Special Forces soldiers dug bullets out of their victims’ bodies. But US Rear Adm. Gregory Smith, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal’s spokesman, said no forensic evidence or eyewitness testimony had been presented to support that account, the Los Angeles newspaper said.
Admiral’s Smith’s statements appear to be a classic non-denial denial. Apparently no one outside the US military is in any position to provide definitive “forensic” evidence, because Afghan investigators were not able to autopsy the bodies, as The New York Times reported, and because Afghan police were prevented by foreign forces from coming near the bodies, as The Los Angeles Times reported.
As for “eyewitness testimony,” The New York Times reported on April 5:
Mohammed Tahir, whose 18-year-old daughter was killed, said he had watched from the compound through an open door as an American knelt over one corpse with a knife and tried to extract bullets. “I saw them working on the bodies,” Mr. Tahir said. “I saw a knife in one of the Americans’ hands.”
But regardless of whether US forces removed bullets from the bodies – or if they did, what their motivation was for doing so – on the more basic question of whether there was a “cover-up” by US forces, it’s hard to come up with any plausible story consistent with information now in the public domain that does not conform to the ordinary meaning of the term “coverup.”
Here is part of what a NATO press release said about the incident on February 12, still posted on NATO’s Web site:
Joint Force Operating in Gardez Makes Gruesome Discovery
An Afghan-international security force found the bound and gagged bodies of three women during an operation in the Gardez district, Paktiya Province, last night.
The joint force went to a compound near the village of Khatabeh, after intelligence confirmed militant activity. Several insurgents engaged the joint force in a fire fight and were killed. Subsequently, a large number of men, women and children exited the compound and were detained by the joint force. When the joint force entered the compound, they conducted a thorough search of the area and found the bodies of three women who had been tied up, gagged and killed. The bodies had been hidden in an adjacent room.
NATO now admits that this account of events was not true: the women were killed during the US Special Forces raid.
Writing for Inter Press Service on April 7, Gareth Porter reported:
McChrystal’s spokesman, Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, told IPS Monday, “I can tell you unequivocally that there was no evidence of a cover-up.”
In an email response to a question from IPS about how it was possible that the US Special Operations Forces personnel had killed the women but believed they had been killed before the raid, Breasseale suggested that the joint force had not discovered the bodies for some extended period of time after beginning their search of the compound.
But go back to the February 12 NATO press release, still posted on the Web. Not only was it claimed that the women were already dead when US Special Forces arrived on the scene, it was claimed that they were “tied up” and “gagged.”
Even if one were to accept the claim that the US Special Forces could not distinguish between women that they had killed and women who were already dead when the raid began, presumably it does not require advanced medical training to distinguish between a corpse which is “tied up” and “gagged” and one which is not. Either they were or “tied up” and “gagged” or they were not. If they were not, then the claim that they were was a lie, and some human being made up that story, and presumably that story was made up to obscure the fact that the women were killed by the US Special Forces. And I would imagine that if one were to ask 100 disinterested observers selected at random, 100 would say that the fabrication of such a story, which was subsequently released by NATO as official information, would constitute a “coverup.”
If you don’t want your tax dollars spent murdering Afghan civilians, tell Congress.
Not everyone can pay for the news. But if you can, we need your support.
Truthout is widely read among people with lower incomes and among young people who are mired in debt. Our site is read at public libraries, among people without internet access of their own. People print out our articles and send them to family members in prison — we receive letters from behind bars regularly thanking us for our coverage. Our stories are emailed and shared around communities, sparking grassroots mobilization.
We’re committed to keeping all Truthout articles free and available to the public. But in order to do that, we need those who can afford to contribute to our work to do so.
We’ll never require you to give, but we can ask you from the bottom of our hearts: Will you donate what you can, so we can continue providing journalism in the service of justice and truth?