Arizona's premiere research institution in Tucson, the University of Arizona, today finds itself in an ethical crisis over investments that resonates with dramatic local events from nearly three decades ago. One of us (John) is old enough to remember that time and what it felt like to participate in the Arizona movement which, in part, facilitated UofA divestment from companies supporting South African apartheid and the regime's human rights abuses against its black majority.
That movement is a guiding light to the situation today whereby the UofA is invested (through business contracts and pension funds) in Caterpillar and Motorola which similarly support Israel violence and racial segregation towards Palestinians under a brutal 45-year military occupation and colonial settlement.
Bill Van Esveld, a recent (February 28) guest speaker at the UofA, is a witness to these actions as a Jerusalem-based, senior research analyst of world-renowned Human Rights Watch (HRW).
Van Esveld writes of the situation in his report for HRW entitled, “Separate and Unequal: Israel's Discriminatory Treatment of Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territories”: “Palestinians face systematic discrimination merely because of their race, ethnicity, and national origin, depriving them of electricity, water, schools, and access to roads, while nearby Jewish settlers enjoy all of these state-provided benefits. While Israeli settlements flourish, Palestinians under Israeli control live in a time warp – not just separate, not just unequal, but sometimes even pushed off their lands and out of their homes.”
UofA community members are not alone in our three-year-long divestment efforts. Just a few days ago, on February 17, the leadership of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) took what it called a “Historic Stand” recommending divestment of its holdings in companies – including Caterpillar and Motorola Solutions – supporting the Israeli occupation. According to the Church's press release: “Much like the decision by Presbyterians in 1983 to divest from companies profiting from Apartheid in South Africa, this is an action that will send a clear message to the world that our Church will do everything in our power to make sure it does not profit from violence or the systematic violation of Palestinian human rights.”
In the days following the Arizona Board of Regents' own historic September 1985 decision to order its public universities, ASU and UofA, to divest $3.4 million in companies supporting South Africa, the editorial board of the Arizona Daily Star lucidly explained the background context, in moral terms, for its readers.
In an editorial entitled “Act of Principle: Board of Regents could do no less than disinvest.” the Daily Star wrote: “The board voted Friday to withdraw university investments in corporations that operate in South Africa because institutions that are grounded in the principles of democracy and personal freedom cannot, in conscience, participate in blatant racial discrimination.”
Once again, the UofA (via ABOR) has the opportunity to take ethically principled action against racial discrimination through its connections with businesses, CAT and Motorola, which are profiting from this violation of international law and human rights.
Together with a broadening coalition of religious denominations, universities, local governments, and individual investors, a major campaign of divestment was influential in the non-violent termination of apartheid in South Africa.
The elder of us participated in this process right here in Tucson wherein local student and community groups such as Students Against Apartheid and Tucsonans Against Apartheid and others throughout Arizona organized together to create social change. Today, representing two generations, we both support a burgeoning local movement that will, we hope, pressure the University, through ABOR, to once again align its principles with its actions for a lasting and honorable peace in Palestine/Israel.
Gabriel M. Schivone is a former columnist/reporter of the UofA's official newspaper, The Arizona Daily Wildcat; he extensively reported on the CAT/Motorola issue between 2009-2010. He is also a member of the coalition of student groups leading the UA divestment campaign, UA No More Deaths, Jewish Voice for Peace, and Students for Justice in Palestine.
John M. Fife is pastor emeritus of Southside Presbyterian Church, and from 1973-1981 served as the chair of Mission Responsibility through Investment (MRTI) of the Presbyterian Church (USA).
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.