Skip to content Skip to footer

UN Investigation Finds “Genocidal Intent” in Myanmar

Myanmar’s military is burning down villages, beating people, shooting them, burning them to death and starving them.

Rohingya wait in line for humanitarian aid in Kutupalong camp August 27, 2018 in Kutupalong, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.

After 10,000 Rohingya deaths and hundreds of thousands of exiles, a new United Nations report has found signs of “genocidal intent” in Myanmar, where the military has been persecuting the Rohingya Muslim minority.

The UN is calling for trials in the case of the prime offenders, including a group of generals — Soe Win, Aung Kyaw Zaw, Maung Maung Soe, Aung Aung and Than Oo — as well as the commander-in-chief.

Advocates have been warning that the situation in Myanmar appears to be approaching “ethnic cleansing” or “genocide,” but this report codifies the work of an independent fact-finding commission for the international community.

The members of the team have worked for over a year to document activities in Myanmar and beyond, and their evidence collection includes interviews as well as visual records. Their report was filed without official access to Myanmar, as the government refused to cooperate.

While international leaders may have had an excuse for failing to act before these atrocities came to light, this document puts pressure on them to hold Myanmar’s government and military accountable for continued human rights abuses.

The military has been claiming for years that it is engaged in routine operations to protect national security. Human rights advocates — and now the UN — maintain that this is clearly not the case. Instead, the Rohingya are being subjected to a targeted campaign of harassment and murder.

Myanmar’s military is burning down villages, beating people, shooting them, burning them to death and starving them — all after stripping the Rohingya of civil rights, like the ability to move freely through the country.

Those who are able to escape are pouring over the borders into neighboring nations, where governments are struggling to accommodate their needs. Meanwhile, Myanmar has been suppressing the press, making it challenging for journalists to report on what is happening. In fact, two Reuters journalists have been in prison since December 2017 for their reporting.

While military abuse is centered in the report, the authors note that these probable crimes against humanity would not be possible without the civilian government’s willingness to enable them. Aung San Suu Kyi, Myanmar’s current leader, is a Nobel Peace Prize laureate, and she has been criticized for failing to defend the human rights of this vulnerable minority community.

The UN Security Council is in a position to refer people for trial in the Hague, but there’s a problem: China and Russia are both friends to those in leadership, and they’re unlikely to participate in a vote that would lead to prosecution. The situation is complicated by the fact that Myanmar is not a signatory to the agreement that would make it subject to the oversight of the court.

Shortly after the UN report was released, Facebook took action on several prominent accounts, highlighting past criticism regarding its alleged role in the spread of disinformation and organizing materials in Myanmar. The social media giant also acknowledged that it had been named as a complicit party in the report. At a time when many are discussing the outsized role of social media as an influence on politics and society, this move is a reminder that advocating for better moderation policies and more responsibility at major tech companies is critically important for freedom and democracy.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.