On Tuesday, Fox News primetime host Tucker Carlson seemed to beg President Joe Biden to stop the Manhattan District Attorney’s inquiry into former President Donald Trump.
Trump claimed over the weekend that he would be arrested this week because of that investigation, which is reportedly examining whether he illegally falsified business records to make hush money payments to an adult film actress he allegedly had an affair with. The former president called for his followers to protest on Tuesday against him being arrested, which few actually did.
On Tuesday night, Carlson made a direct call to Biden to stop the Manhattan-based inquiry, an action that the president of the United States doesn’t actually have the power to do.
Carlson falsely claimed that the grand jury examining Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s evidence against Trump would “certainly be overwhelmingly liberal,” a claim that is entirely baseless because no one outside the local judiciary knows who is sitting on the panel. He also suggested that a charge against Trump would be detrimental to the country, despite knowing nothing about the exact details of the evidence or the potential charges.
“Unless something unexpected happens, Democrats will have taken the unprecedented step of using a corrupt justice system to take out the front runner in the Republican presidential field in a presidential race,” Carlson said, referring to Trump’s announced run for president in 2024. “If that happens, America will never be the same.”
Carlson then suggested that Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland needed to take action to prevent a charge against Trump, stating:
You’ve got to hope that for the sake of the country, the Biden White House, which will be running against Trump, will put the country above partisanship and stop this. And that Merrick Garland at the DOJ will issue a very public statement saying that this is wrong — which it is — and therefore preserve for our grandchildren our justice system.
Notably, the president of the United States cannot micromanage local investigations at the state level, meaning that Biden has no official say over whether or not Bragg issues an indictment.
Biden can issue a forceful statement against the inquiry or eventual charges against Trump, if he wanted to. Doing so, however, would improperly influence and politicize the outcome of a criminal investigation, something that Carlson and Republicans claim they are against.
Notably, Trump and Fox News personalities promoted chants of “lock her up” regarding then-Democratic candidate for president Hillary Clinton, prominently featuring such chants in campaign rallies for Trump during his 2016 presidential run. In recent days, as Trump and his allies level accusations that inquiries into his actions are “politically motivated,” some hosts have dubiously claimed that chants directed at Clinton were just “jokes.”
In truth, Trump was reportedly very interested in using his political powers to go after his opponents, including Clinton. According to reporting from The New York Times in 2018, for instance, Trump wanted the DOJ to arrest Clinton over allegations that she had used a private email server to hide classified material. (Clinton has been exonerated of any purposeful wrongdoing). His White House legal counsel told him that he couldn’t do so, the reporting indicated.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.