Last week, the Commerce Department released data on equipment investment for December 2018. Orders for new equipment were up just 2 percent from year–ago levels and actually down almost 2 percent from the levels reached in July 2018. In fact, even the peak level reached in July was lower than the peak reached under Obama in March of 2012, and that’s before adjusting for inflation.
The other categories of investment don’t look much better. The smaller categories of intellectual property products and nonresidential construction are both seeing modest single–digit increases. This is fine for normal times, but there is no acceleration from the growth rate we saw under Obama. In short, we clearly are not seeing the investment boom promised by the Trump administration and other proponents of its tax cut.
In case folks had forgotten, the main rationale for the tax cut was supposed to be that it would trigger a huge surge in investment. This was supposedly the reason that corporations received the bulk of the tax cuts.
While the immediate beneficiaries of a cut in corporate taxes are shareholders, who are disproportionately the rich and very rich, the argument was that ordinary workers would ultimately be the biggest beneficiaries. The story was that lower tax rates would give corporations more incentive to invest. More investment would lead to more productivity growth. With workers getting their share of productivity growth in higher wages, the typical working family would be $4,000 better off as a result of the tax cuts, after just four years.
While we still have some ways to go to get to the four-year mark, after a year we are seeing zero evidence of their investment boom story. It is important to recognize that these data are for orders. It takes time to put investment in place, but it does not take very long to place orders. If there was going to be an investment boom because of the tax cuts, it should be showing up in orders by now.
There also is no evidence of any positive impact on productivity growth. Some of us had hoped that the tightening of the labor market, which had been going on for years before the tax cut, would lead to a pick-up in productivity growth for reasons having nothing to do with the tax cut.
When workers are scarce, employers have more reason to economize on labor. This could mean reorganizing workplaces to make them more efficient and automating tasks where possible. Whatever employers are doing in response to the tighter labor market, it is not showing up in the productivity data. Productivity has increased just 1.3 percent over the last year, the same as its pace over the last decade.
The impact of the tax cuts on investment and productivity growth is not the only prediction the tax cut promoters got wrong. It turns out that they substantially overestimated the tax revenue they would collect; or, to take the other side, they underestimated the extent to which companies would still find ways to avoid or evade taxes.
Part of the rationale for cutting tax rates was to reduce the incentive and opportunity for companies to get out of paying their taxes. While the tax rate had been 35 percent before the tax cut, very few companies paid anything close to this rate. The claim was that the 21 percent rate is considerably lower, but at least companies would pay it.
That turns out not to be the case. After the tax cut was passed, the Congressional Budget Office projected that the government would take in $243 billion in corporate income tax in 2018, but the government only collected $205 billion, almost 20 percent less than had been projected.
While the gap between the initial projection and the most recent ones are somewhat lower for later years, it looks like we will collect even less tax revenue from corporations than the Trump administration had promised. There are ways to design the corporate income tax so that we do get the intended revenue, but unfortunately, there seems little interest from either Republicans or Democrats about putting an end to tax avoidance and evasion by corporations.
In short, the Trump tax cut didn’t get us the investment and wage growth that was promised. It also didn’t eliminate the loopholes that allowed corporations to escape their tax liabilities. The only thing it succeeded in was making the very rich even richer.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.