Skip to content Skip to footer

Trump’s Election Interference Trial May Stretch Past Election, Legal Experts Say

Additional guilty pleas and investigations into leaks or witness intimidation are likely to push the case into 2025.

Former President Donald Trump speaks to guests during a campaign event at the Orpheum Theater on October 29, 2023, in Sioux City, Iowa.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis said in an interview Tuesday that the sprawling racketeering case against Trump and his co-defendants could extend past the presidential election into early 2025.

“I believe in that case there will be a trial,” Willis said during an interview at the Washington Post global women’s summit. “I believe the trial will take many months. And I don’t expect that we will conclude until the winter or the very early part of 2025.”

There are several areas where delays are likely to happen and could cause the trial to be extended beyond the 2024 election, Bennett Gershman, a former New York prosecutor and law professor at Pace University, told Salon.

“I am thinking of potential leaks of evidence and proceedings to investigate and remedy the leaks, claims that witnesses are being intimidated and the need to investigate such claims, ongoing discovery motions and the considerable litigation involving those motions,” Gershman said.

Other factors that could impact the case may include the possibility of more defendants pleading guilty and the need to reshape the case and the evidence that’s presented to the jury as a result of that, he added.

“And of course the problems that will attend the need to select an impartial jury in the midst of one of the most controversial and consequential elections in American history,” Gershman said.

Legal experts have questioned why the D.A. has raised the possibility of the case likely going into 2025 since she said last month that they were ready to go to a four-month trial.

But the “sheer number” of defendants and the range of RICO charges will make this case longer than most, Laurie Levenson, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University, told Salon.

“Each defendant is likely to file motions, examine witnesses, and even seek appeals that could delay the trial,” Levenson said. “By its nature, RICO is a charge that includes multiple conspiracies and schemes. Therefore, this case will be a combination of many different conspiracies, each of which will take time to present to the jury.”

Trump, who is the front-runner for the 2024 Republican nominee for president, has pleaded not guilty and repeatedly tried to delay his different legal cases until after the 2024 presidential election.

It is “hard” to determine what impact Trump’s Georgia trial will have on the presidential election since it depends on several unknown factors, Levenson pointed out. These include the possibility of additional defendants pleading guilty and cooperating, how strong the prosecution’s evidence be, if Trump is convicted in another case and how much the trial sidelines Trump from campaigning.

“It is not abnormal that a sprawling RICO trial, such as the one facing Trump, would take many months to reach a verdict,” Temidayo Aganga-Williams, white-collar partner at Selendy Gay Elsberg and former senior investigative counsel for the House Jan. 6 committee, told Salon. “What is odd is that the Trump legal team has been pushing to delay all of his criminal trials past Election Day. Trump clearly sees winning the White House and thereafter obstructing the completion of the criminal cases against him as the best way for him to avoid prison time.”

Trump has accused Willis of being influenced by politics, “but to alter the trial schedule to subordinate the criminal justice system to the presidential campaign schedule would do just that,” he added, arguing that Trump cannot have it both ways.

The public’s right to have criminal cases of significant importance adjudicated quickly should not be disregarded because a private citizen made the choice to run for office, Aganga-Williams said. “A voluntary campaign for political office is not a shield from accountability.”

The trial start date has not yet been set in the case. So far, four defendants have pleaded guilty to reduced charges in exchange for their cooperation.

“We’ve also seen many of the most culpable defendants already plead guilty and we can be sure that more guilty pleas will be forthcoming,” Aganga-Williams said. “This will only ease the pressure on the trial schedule by making it more likely that there will be one trial in Georgia and not multiple.”

The former president is expected to follow his “typical playbook and lie” about why he is on trial, the reason for the trial schedule as well as the conduct of Willis and President Joe Biden, he added.

“It is of utmost importance that the focus remains on why Trump is in the situation he is in — multiple grand juries of his peers found probable that he engaged in extensive criminal conduct to intentionally undermine the integrity of our elections,” Aganga-Williams said.

We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.

As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.

Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.

As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.

At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.

Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.

You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.