Republican nominee for president Donald Trump claimed on Monday that he could become more popular with voters if he’s convicted of committing a crime.
Trump made the comments following a court hearing in which a New York state judge scheduled a trial date for the case involving his making hush-money payments to adult entertainers with whom he had extramarital affairs, and concealing the payments by falsifying business records for his company, the Trump Organization.
Immediately after the hearing, which Trump had attended in person, the former president denounced the action, falsely describing it (as he has charges and pre-trial actions in other cases) as “election interference” and as a “witch hunt” against him.
Trump was also asked by reporters whether he was concerned if a conviction against him could potentially cost him the election against President Joe Biden. Trump suggested that the opposite might hold true.
“Well, it could also make me more popular,” Trump explained, “because the people know it’s a scam.”
Polling tells a different story.
Surveys conducted at various points over the past year show that, should Trump receive a conviction in any of the four cases he’s currently facing, it would hurt his chances at reclaiming the White House for a second nonconsecutive term.
A Politico/Ipsos poll from late last summer, for example, found that 32 percent of voters overall would be less likely to back Trump if he’s convicted. A New York Times/Siena College poll in November examining voters in swing states found a similar outcome, noting that, while Trump was ahead of Biden at that time by 4 points, he would lose to Biden by 10 points in those states if he received a guilty verdict between then and Election Day.
Those more dated polls match up with recent data, too. An NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll published in February found that Biden and Trump were statistically tied among voters. However, when presented with the possibility that Trump could be convicted, Biden took the lead, by a margin of 51 percent to 45 percent.
Exit polling data also shows that Trump faces difficulties with Republican voters if he’s convicted between now and November. Among participants in Virginia’s Super Tuesday primary race, 37 percent of voters said they wouldn’t find Trump fit to be president if he’s convicted. Thirty-two percent of voters in North Carolina’s GOP primary said the same thing, and in South Carolina’s primary election exit polling, which took place in February, 32 percent said he wouldn’t be fit to serve if he’s convicted.
Trump’s attempts to delay the trials beyond Election Day (with hopes that he can win the election and have his charges dismissed), are also looked down upon by voters, and it’s possible that continued news reports about his efforts to delay the trials could hurt him in the polls as Election Day approaches.
According to a CNN/SSRS poll published in February that looked specifically at his federal election subversion trial, 48 percent of voters said it was “essential” that the trial conclude before November, with another 16 percent saying they would prefer a verdict before voting takes place. Only 11 percent believed that the trial should be delayed until after the election.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today during our fundraiser. We have 8 days to add 460 new monthly donors. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.