Do you feel like the White House Cabinet Room has turned into some kind of revolving door? It’s not just your imagination. Trump has fired more cabinet members at the start of his term than any other president in the last 100 years, according to an NPR analysis.
And that’s just looking at the Senate-confirmable positions in the presidential cabinet — not the overall turmoil within the Trump team at large.
In addition to Rex Tillerson – fired via Twitter this month — the administration has released former Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price and former Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly, who took a post at the White House as Chief of Staff, replacing Reince Priebus. At this rate, it seems likely that Trump will catch up with President Ronald Reagan, who fired four cabinet members in his first two years.
NPR research has also identified unusually high turnover among White House senior staff, including advisors, communications directors and staff secretaries. While high-profile individuals like Hope Hicks, Steve Bannon, Gary Cohn and Rob Porter have captured headlines, they haven’t been the only ones — and that’s without even delving into the loss of senior FBI officials and leaders of non-cabinet agencies. Vanishing senior staffers often take their support personnel with them as well, creating a domino effect when someone leaves.
The high turnover in the Trump team may reflect a number of factors. While it’s common for presidents to appoint seasoned, experienced people to their initial cabinets in the hopes of pushing through key initiatives, Trump opted for individuals who weren’t necessarily suitable — sometimes explicitly selecting people on the basis of “outsider status.” And that seems to have become a problem, with officials struggling to manage their agencies effectively and efficiently.
Trump is also notoriously volatile, and some personnel may have been pushed out of the cabinet and the White House because their priorities no longer aligned with his expectations. The president’s decision to conduct considerable business over Twitterrather than via more conventional avenues highlights this issue: Trump’s career has prepared him for public performance and attention, but not necessarily the managerial skills needed in the Oval Office.
Losing senior staffers and cabinet members on a regular basis threatens national stability and security. The benefit of political experience is deep familiarity with the issues facing government agencies, paired with the knowledge of how to address these challenges. When senior personnel and their staff leave, it can create a vacuum that leaves agencies stumbling to meet their obligations.
Things are chaotic enough during presidential transitions, as the entire federal government undergoes an overhaul — and losing agency heads little more than a year into a presidency can be demoralizing.
Some turnover in the federal government is entirely normal; it’s not uncommon for people to leave positions when they’re promoted to roles elsewhere in the federal government, for example. And for two-term presidents, few ranking personnel and staffers make it all the way through eight years of service. But signs of instability in the halls of power are worrying — they can suggest problems with morale, or a presidency that isn’t certain which direction to take things, leaving staff unsure about how to accomplish tasks.
Some may spin the high turnover as evidence of “draining the swamp” or further proof of outsider or renegade status. But the only thing it’s proof of is disorganization: The president hasn’t accomplished many of the goals he proclaimed would be key to his first year in office, and organizational dysfunction is one reason why.
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.