In what progressive lawmakers and advocacy groups decried as the Trump administration’s latest “shameful” attack on vulnerable families, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) unveiled a plan on Wednesday that would gut regulations protecting consumers from predatory payday lenders.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, denounced the CFPB’s plan as “a slap in the face to consumers — especially people of color — who have been victims of predatory business practices and abusive lenders.”
“This decision will put already struggling families in a cycle of debt and leave them in an even worse financial position,” Gupta added. “This administration has moved the CFPB away from protecting consumers to protecting the very companies abusing them.”
This decision will put already struggling families in a cycle of debt and leave them in an even worse financial position. Make no mistake: This administration has moved the @CFPB away from protecting consumers to protecting the very companies abusing them. #StopTheDebtTrap https://t.co/ghx9yEnmpo
— Vanita Gupta (@vanitaguptaCR) February 6, 2019
Borrowers need protections from predatory lenders, not the other way around. @CFPBDirector should fulfill the Bureau’s mission to protect consumers, instead of giving breaks to loan sharks #StopTheDebtTrap #ProtectConsumers
— NCLC (@NCLC4consumers) February 6, 2019
Detailed in a statement by Trump-appointed CFPB director Kathy Kraninger, the agency’s proposal would dramatically weaken an Obama-era rule that would have required payday lenders to verify that borrowers have the financial ability to repay their loans — an effort to help vulnerable people avoid falling into debt traps.
In its explanation of the rule change, the CFPB said it wants consumers to have even more access to payday lenders, despite their long record of exploiting the poor.
“Kraninger is siding with the payday loan sharks instead of the American people,” Rebecca Borné, senior policy counsel at the Center for Responsible Lending, said in a statement. “We urge director Kraninger to reconsider, as her current plan will keep families trapped in predatory, unaffordable debt.”
The original rule was initially set to take effect in January, but the Trump administration has delayed implementation until August.
In a tweet responding to the agency’s proposed rollback, former CFPB chief Richard Cordray called the plan “a bad move that will hurt the hardest-hit consumers” and predicted that it “will be subject to a stiff legal challenge.”
CFPB is proposing to unwind the core part of its payday loan rule – that the lender must reasonably assess a borrower’s ability to repay before making a loan. It’s a bad move that will hurt the hardest-hit consumers. It should be and will be subject to a stiff legal challenge.
— Rich Cordray (@RichCordray) February 6, 2019
“Eliminating these protections would be a grave error and would leave the 12 million Americans who use payday loans every year exposed to unaffordable payments at interest rates that average nearly 400 percent,” concluded Alex Horowitz, senior research officer with Pew Charitable Trusts’ consumer finance project. “This proposal is not a tweak to the existing rule; instead, it’s a complete dismantling of the consumer protections finalized in 2017.”
We’re not backing down in the face of Trump’s threats.
As Donald Trump is inaugurated a second time, independent media organizations are faced with urgent mandates: Tell the truth more loudly than ever before. Do that work even as our standard modes of distribution (such as social media platforms) are being manipulated and curtailed by forces of fascist repression and ruthless capitalism. Do that work even as journalism and journalists face targeted attacks, including from the government itself. And do that work in community, never forgetting that we’re not shouting into a faceless void – we’re reaching out to real people amid a life-threatening political climate.
Our task is formidable, and it requires us to ground ourselves in our principles, remind ourselves of our utility, dig in and commit.
As a dizzying number of corporate news organizations – either through need or greed – rush to implement new ways to further monetize their content, and others acquiesce to Trump’s wishes, now is a time for movement media-makers to double down on community-first models.
At Truthout, we are reaffirming our commitments on this front: We won’t run ads or have a paywall because we believe that everyone should have access to information, and that access should exist without barriers and free of distractions from craven corporate interests. We recognize the implications for democracy when information-seekers click a link only to find the article trapped behind a paywall or buried on a page with dozens of invasive ads. The laws of capitalism dictate an unending increase in monetization, and much of the media simply follows those laws. Truthout and many of our peers are dedicating ourselves to following other paths – a commitment which feels vital in a moment when corporations are evermore overtly embedded in government.
Over 80 percent of Truthout‘s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and the remaining 20 percent comes from a handful of social justice-oriented foundations. Over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors, many of whom give because they want to help us keep Truthout barrier-free for everyone.
You can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.